this post was submitted on 13 Feb 2025
136 points (98.6% liked)

News

25180 readers
4314 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Four and a half years ago, a newly formed corporate entity purchased a low-income housing complex with 264 apartments in Phoenix. The property had received more than $4 million in federal tax credits and, in exchange, was supposed to remain affordable for decades.

The company then used a legal loophole that stripped the affordability protections from the apartments. The maneuver appears to have been lucrative for the company, which bought the property for under $20 million and flipped it two years later for $63 million. Today, advertised rents there have gone up by around 50%.

Some 115,000 apartments in the United States have lost rent restrictions as a result, according to one estimate. Experts say these conversions are exacerbating the nation’s shortage of affordable housing, which has intensified in recent years. One report recently concluded that the country has nearly 5 million fewer housing units than it needs. The problem is most acute for those with low incomes.

The loophole has remained open for decades despite widespread agreement among regulators and advocates about its harm. Congressional efforts to repeal the provision have failed — most recently in 2023 — though state reforms have trimmed its effects. President Donald Trump has pledged to lower housing costs, but some advocates for reform are skeptical that his administration or a Republican-controlled Congress will strike a statute that can be lucrative to the real estate industry. (The White House did not respond to a request for comment.)

top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Delta_V 33 points 6 days ago

The loophole:

The program offers developers a tax subsidy worth potentially millions of dollars in exchange for keeping units affordable and renting them only to . . . households making below 60% of the area median income . . . Rent and income restrictions are supposed to last at least 30 years. But, after just 14 years, property owners may ask their states to find buyers . . . States can only sell at prices set by a formula that almost always overvalues the properties. As a result, buyers are rarely found. If states can’t find buyers within a year, owners are free to raise rents . . .

[–] extremeboredom 14 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Landlords are parasites. The rest of us are expected to work for our money. Landlords simply use their capital to absorb wealth from those without capital. Free money for no work. It's disgusting.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

I have extra property that I inherited and I'm trying to offload. The sane rent price would be maybe $500-$600/mo to pay for upkeep, time to drive out there and check on it, etc, but in this market it'd probably easily go for $1200/mo. I wouldn't want to rent it for $1200/mo because I KNOW it isn't worth that. I know myself well enough to know that I cannot be assed with being an attentive landlord, especially for a property that far away. That just leaves me with selling the place.

All that to say that I just absolutely cannot relate to these fucking people doing this. It's like our whole system is the banality of evil writ large.

[–] Landless2029 3 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

I don't think it's landlords.

Its corporate land barons.

This is just plain greed. I've lived in apartments all my life and never had an issue with rent rasing or repairs.

There's also the middle class owning a multi family trying to get into home ownership.

Call it what it is. This is yet another attack in the class war that's supported by Republicans and obviously Trump.