this post was submitted on 24 Jan 2025
531 points (98.5% liked)

196

1707 readers
3666 users here now

Community Rules

You must post before you leave

Be nice. Assume others have good intent (within reason).

Block or ignore posts, comments, and users that irritate you in some way rather than engaging. Report if they are actually breaking community rules.

Use content warnings and/or mark as NSFW when appropriate. Most posts with content warnings likely need to be marked NSFW.

Most 196 posts are memes, shitposts, cute images, or even just recent things that happened, etc. There is no real theme, but try to avoid posts that are very inflammatory, offensive, very low quality, or very "off topic".

Bigotry is not allowed, this includes (but is not limited to): Homophobia, Transphobia, Racism, Sexism, Abelism, Classism, or discrimination based on things like Ethnicity, Nationality, Language, or Religion.

Avoid shilling for corporations, posting advertisements, or promoting exploitation of workers.

Proselytization, support, or defense of authoritarianism is not welcome. This includes but is not limited to: imperialism, nationalism, genocide denial, ethnic or racial supremacy, fascism, Nazism, Marxism-Leninism, Maoism, etc.

Avoid AI generated content.

Avoid misinformation.

Avoid incomprehensible posts.

No threats or personal attacks.

No spam.

Moderator Guidelines

Moderator Guidelines

  • Don’t be mean to users. Be gentle or neutral.
  • Most moderator actions which have a modlog message should include your username.
  • When in doubt about whether or not a user is problematic, send them a DM.
  • Don’t waste time debating/arguing with problematic users.
  • Assume the best, but don’t tolerate sealioning/just asking questions/concern trolling.
  • Ask another mod to take over cases you struggle with, if you get tired, or when things get personal.
  • Ask the other mods for advice when things get complicated.
  • Share everything you do in the mod matrix, both so several mods aren't unknowingly handling the same issues, but also so you can receive feedback on what you intend to do.
  • Don't rush mod actions. If a case doesn't need to be handled right away, consider taking a short break before getting to it. This is to say, cool down and make room for feedback.
  • Don’t perform too much moderation in the comments, except if you want a verdict to be public or to ask people to dial a convo down/stop. Single comment warnings are okay.
  • Send users concise DMs about verdicts about them, such as bans etc, except in cases where it is clear we don’t want them at all, such as obvious transphobes. No need to notify someone they haven’t been banned of course.
  • Explain to a user why their behavior is problematic and how it is distressing others rather than engage with whatever they are saying. Ask them to avoid this in the future and send them packing if they do not comply.
  • First warn users, then temp ban them, then finally perma ban them when they break the rules or act inappropriately. Skip steps if necessary.
  • Use neutral statements like “this statement can be considered transphobic” rather than “you are being transphobic”.
  • No large decisions or actions without community input (polls or meta posts f.ex.).
  • Large internal decisions (such as ousting a mod) might require a vote, needing more than 50% of the votes to pass. Also consider asking the community for feedback.
  • Remember you are a voluntary moderator. You don’t get paid. Take a break when you need one. Perhaps ask another moderator to step in if necessary.

founded 1 week ago
MODERATORS
 
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] vegantomato 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)
  1. How do you define rich?
  2. By your definition, do you think it is possible to be rich without taking other people's rights? If not, why?
[–] AngryCommieKender 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Anyone that has above $100,000,000 USD in wealth stole wages from multiple people, somewhere along the way.

In theory, if one was born into wealth, and was lucky as all fuck, they could "earn" enough to be flirting with $100,000,000 without underpaying anyone, but that is unlikely. A more realistic cutoff is $10,000,000 to $20,000,000

[–] MFGnomes 1 points 1 day ago

1: rich is a relative term, but for the sake of argument let’s say it’s if someone has had all of their basic needs met (food, shelter, healthcare), is able to pursue diversion/fulfillment outside of work, and still has enough surplus to hoard without compromising the previous two points.
2: no, it is not possible because as long as there are those who lack adequate food, shelter, or healthcare any surplus wealth should be used to either provide a path for those who are lacking to be able to obtain those necessities themselves or provide those necessities directly (especially in the case of the elderly, infirmed, and/or disabled). To do otherwise would be to deny them of their unalienable rights to life (food, shelter, healthcare) or pursuit of happiness (to live a life worth living).

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 days ago

I don't envy the rich because I don't want to be an immoral piece of shit

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 days ago

Jodie Foster is a real one

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Attacking the rich is not envy. It is self defense. The hoarding of wealth is the cause of poverty. The rich aren't just indifferent to poverty, they create and maintain it.
- J. Foster

~ @ ScottImordino

~ More Perfect Union

~ [email protected]

[–] JayDee 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Never before has 'I know a guy who knows a guy who has a friend that heard that this guy said this' been so well documented.

Best I have for the quote is from Snopes.com which states that this did not come from Jodie Foster. That was the last J. Foster I was expecting this to be attributed to.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

[email protected]

Hahaha well stated though

[–] DaddleDew 21 points 2 days ago

Of course. It is an effective way to always have a huge basin of people desperate for work which you can then brutally underpay and exploit. And here's the fun part: If you underpay them enough they won't even be able to pursue better working conditions!

The US never moved on from their slave based economy mentality. They just replaced black people with poor people (who also happen to be overrepresentatingly black).

[–] Valmond 20 points 2 days ago (1 children)

And at a certain point they probably don't even know why.

[–] JoshuaBrusque 8 points 2 days ago

Oh they know why, they just don't care.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

The only real scarcity I want to see is scarse lineups at the Rich people guillotine, because we're done. Lots of work to be done before that is accomplished.

Of course there is no need to use the guillotine because they voluntarily contribute their unimaginable wealth to helping the rest of us.

[–] PunnyName 6 points 2 days ago

but, but StOcKS anD bOnDs!