this post was submitted on 16 Jan 2025
331 points (95.8% liked)

Memes

46104 readers
3223 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

top 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 15 points 14 hours ago

hey where is the high res image? i need to check the math

[–] [email protected] 10 points 16 hours ago

The topology enthusiast says the jug is full of glass

[–] [email protected] 6 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

What's really gonna bake your noodle is that the jug will be less full of you tilt it to the right slightly.

[–] asdfasdfasdf 4 points 15 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 14 hours ago

Because the pouring spout is to the right. Tip it, you’ll see. It works better if you are staring closely at the spout from below when you do so.

[–] [email protected] 38 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

Why do High Functioning / Savants get to represent all autistic people all the time ?

EDIT : 60.69% of the time.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 day ago

Hey we need people like that, remember when an autistic person discovered few hundred millisecond delay in ssh which uncovered Jia Tan backdoor.

[–] [email protected] 37 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Anyone else bothered by the inconsistent conjugation here? Should be "optimism" and "pessimism" to go with "autism".

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yes. Or change "autism" to "autist".

[–] [email protected] 5 points 20 hours ago

Yeah you definitely could. Personally I wouldn't be bothered by it in a humorous context like this. But I know that's a term that does sometimes cause offence, so I chose the alternative.

[–] SpaceNoodle 44 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I'd weigh the jug as-is, then weigh it full, and then weigh it empty; the proceeding trivial calculation of the original filled volume would be arguably more accurate.

[–] Dagnet 35 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The engineering way to do it. Why go through the trouble of perfectly modeling it if you can just test a few times. Either that or consider the jug a cylinder and add a safety factor of 2.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 18 hours ago

the safety factor got me

[–] SpaceNoodle 9 points 1 day ago

It also gives you a way to validate your calculations when you inevitably do model it.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Behold, the pragmatist.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 day ago

A) The water isn't pure there will be minerals dissolved in it

B) There is likely water vapor in the air occupying the jug

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Literalist: The glass contains about 50% water.

Nihilist: The glass doesn't matter.

Anarchist: The glass is now full of piss.

Absurdist: the glass is now upside-down without spilling the water.

Me: I don't know who's glass this is so it's going in the sink.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 15 hours ago

Dadaist: ce n'est pas un verre.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

i'm not too fond of the autistic superintelligence meme. yes there are people like this, but personally i can't math for shit.

i could probably go on about an interesting locomotive i found yesterday if you want a few hours wasted though...

[–] [email protected] 5 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

I didn't read super intelligence into it, I read overdoing and I found that it struck home. I don't know math either, but if I did, I would have done the same calculation.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 18 hours ago

that's fair.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This roughly checks out. I'm getting 66%, based on the methodology of cutting out the jug's shape from the picture and numerically integrating the filled and empty volume (e.g. if a row is d pixels wide, it contributes d^2 to the volume, either filled or empty depending on whether it's above or below the water level).

[–] [email protected] 1 points 21 hours ago

@lukewarm_ozone I hope you actually did that math.

[–] RedditWanderer 6 points 1 day ago

Engineers: the jug is twice as big as it needs to be

[–] capt_wolf 10 points 1 day ago

Pfff... Didn't even calculate for the rate of evaporation of the water... Amateur...

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago

Unless there's air inside the water