this post was submitted on 03 Jan 2025
31 points (94.3% liked)

United States | News & Politics

7358 readers
231 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

US President-elect Donald Trump plans to impose devastating sanctions against the International Criminal Court (ICC) in The Hague immediately after taking office, Israel Hayom newspaper reported citing informed sources.

The sources claimed the “executive orders could be unveiled as soon as January 21”, just one day after Trump’s inauguration and “will target both individual ICC personnel, including judges and prosecutors, and the institution as a whole.”

“The administration intends to classify the ICC as an organisation threatening US interests, employing designation procedures similar to those used by the State Department for terrorist organisations globally. This designation will trigger severe restrictions on anyone involved with the court’s operations,” it added.

top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

The reported plans of Donald Trump to impose sanctions on the International Criminal Court (ICC) fit within a broader reactionary agenda aligning with the goals of authoritarian regimes like Russia and China. This move, which aims to delegitimize international accountability mechanisms, highlights the shared priorities of MAGA and authoritarian states: undermining global institutions that challenge their power.

By targeting the ICC—an institution designed to hold individuals and states accountable for crimes against humanity—Trump’s actions echo Russia’s and China’s longstanding rejection of international judicial oversight. Russia withdrew its signature from the Rome Statute in 2016, while China has refused to ratify the treaty. These regimes, along with MAGA-aligned U.S. leadership, oppose any supranational authority that could limit their sovereignty or expose their abuses.

This attack on the ICC serves multiple reactionary purposes:

  1. Reinforcing Nationalism: Trump’s move isolates the U.S. further from global accountability, mirroring the nationalist rhetoric used to suppress class solidarity and justify state power.

  2. Protecting Bourgeois Interests: The ICC’s focus on human rights violations threatens the ruling classes in authoritarian and reactionary states. MAGA, Russia, and China share an interest in shielding the bourgeoisie from legal consequences.

  3. Weakening International Solidarity: By delegitimizing institutions like the ICC, MAGA contributes to the erosion of global frameworks that could unite workers against exploitation and oppression.

This development underscores the convergence of MAGA and authoritarian regimes into what we term M(ARC)GA—a reactionary alliance that prioritizes authoritarian control and the preservation of capitalist hegemony over international justice. The global proletariat must recognize and resist this bloc’s efforts to dismantle institutions that promote accountability and cooperation. Only through solidarity and revolutionary action can we counter these reactionary strategies and advance the fight for a just and equitable world.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 hours ago

Russia and China in no way share the goals of America. Trying to shift the blame on them is a strawman as the threats against the ICC happened under Biden.

And international law has been destroyed by the Democrats.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 days ago

Israel's leash is tight, damn.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Oh lol one breach in the history of bootlick and its master is immediately like "organisation threatening US interests" about it.

[–] pivot_root 5 points 3 days ago (3 children)

So... What was that about Trump bringing peace to Palestine, again?

[–] Skyrmir 4 points 2 days ago

He'll bring peace if he has to kill every man, woman, and child to get it.

Or something along those lines I assume.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

Peace through complete annihilation was always the presented policy.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

No one ever said that, but this is no worse than the Biden policy that Harris promised to continue.

[–] pivot_root 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

No one ever said that

My experiences talking to Trump supporters begs to differ. Among the other unrealistic beliefs held by some of them, Trump is also supposed to bring peace to Ukraine and "make Americal healthy again."

This is no worse than the Biden policy that Harris promised to continue.

I disagree. The ICC has been mostly useless in going after Netanyahu by choice so far. An economic superpower threating to impose sanctions and labeling them as a terrorist organization to "force the court to withdraw the arrest warrants issued against Israeli Prime Minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, and former Defence Minister, Yoav Gallant" isn't just supporting them, but also actively interfering in any international attempt to hold them accountable for their actions.

Those actions are not those of someone trying to toe the line between balancing relations and public perception, but those of someone condoning and wholeheartedly supporting the Israeli government's actions and goals.