this post was submitted on 31 Dec 2024
108 points (94.3% liked)

Privacy

5180 readers
67 users here now

A community for Lemmy users interested in privacy

Rules:

  1. Be civil
  2. No spam posting
  3. Keep posts on-topic
  4. No trolling

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Hawke 61 points 2 months ago

Saving a click: the industry is “child surveillance“.

Yeah, it’s as creepy as it sounds.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Tell me, how many nannies shake their babies? You know, a good hard shake, like, like tryin' to get ketchup out of a bottle. One percent? Less?

Funny, that. They sell a billion dollars worth of that shit worldwide. Goes to show you, doesn't it? The bollocks people will believe if you get them scared enough.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I’m not going against your point but telling an insane story. A friend of mine in California caught their nanny literally throwing and beating the crap out of their infant. When approach they ran back to their country. I’m sure there’s nothing they can do now. I would never even imagine this could happen!

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I think that's Survivorship Bias, but I didn't read too closely after the 'litchally'.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

Survivorship bias about a friend’s child being beaten..? What?

[–] Krudler -5 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Funny but I think your friend is a bit of a liar. Neat hey.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

It’s on the news with hundreds of videos recorded

https://abc7.com/post/exclusive-bay-area-parents-speak-after-2-day-old-baby-seen-camera-allegedly-abused-nanny/15588512/

Why would I make that up? This isn’t Reddit with karma

Edit: okay I see you just challenge everyone in your comments

[–] shalafi 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You find that story hard to believe?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago

It’s literally on the news… idk why I was doubted

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Get normal IP cameras and problem solved.

[–] kalpol 4 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Still gotta block them at the firewall in case they are phoning home. Caught some of mine doing that

[–] IndustryStandard 1 points 2 months ago

With an NVR most of them can run fully offline.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Yeah amcrest pings for config. They’re blocked

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It doesn't. Self-hosted open source surveillance is still surveillance. Constantly monitoring your children (above a certain age) is still helicopter parenting.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

They’re months old, fuck off telling me that’s helicopter parenting. Don’t comment when you literally don’t know

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

That's obviously not what this article is about. Notice how I said "above a certain age"?

[–] IndustryStandard 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

If a slightly older person would migrate to GNU / Linux from a suggestion that it is more private. A young person, who underwent surveillance parenting, will most likely not give a damn.

Oddlyspecific

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

Oddlyspecific

It's okay to leave the space in the middle.

[–] Ok_imagination 3 points 2 months ago

Decent read. Some things I'll have to consider when my kids are old enough.

[–] LovableSidekick 2 points 2 months ago

"Apocalyptically terrible" - wow I wish they wouldn't soft-pedal it like that.

[–] victorz 1 points 2 months ago

Off topic: the design of this site is very confusing. Each section with its heading and text body as a separate card, with the heading in the same color as links are. It makes it look like each card is a summary of a separate blog post or article. Also with the way the background image is static like that.

Need to rethink that design from a reading perspective.