this post was submitted on 30 Dec 2024
799 points (94.6% liked)

Comic Strips

13041 readers
2825 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 101 points 3 days ago (27 children)

In the EU, there's now more women finishing higher education, and going into research programs, than men. (1)

[–] [email protected] 39 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Education in general is quite fucked up for boys, but they are not a protected group so we let them suffer.

[–] surewhynotlem 16 points 3 days ago (1 children)

What protections would you like to see for men?

[–] [email protected] 29 points 3 days ago (1 children)

For education specifically, here's an APA article discussing the problem with a US context, but I have seen the same patterns across other Western education as well.

https://www.apa.org/monitor/2023/04/boys-school-challenges-recommendations

Simply put, sit-and-listen education disadvantages boys, who also tend to receive more severe punishment than girls for the same behaviours. Add on to that gender stereotypes push boys to be dominant, and doing well at school is not cool for boys.

In general, there are a lot of issues we are simply blind to regarding men. Men are treated as disposable, always potential combatants in a war, never the victim and always the perpetrator of domestic violence and violent crime in general.

[–] surewhynotlem 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I like this. But while the study is sex specific, fixing this would benefit boys and girls.

Humans weren't meant to sit in a chair and be talked at.

[–] HasturInYellow 3 points 2 days ago

Well damn. If it helps both I don't wanna do it anymore.

[–] danc4498 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

But the structural inequalities and sexism????

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Don't worry, men will go in the corporate world and make more money than women professors.

[–] Tattorack 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, most men won't. Only the soulless assholes will.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago

😢 Soul-having (what's the opposite of soulless?) people will just be forced to work in the corporate world without making more money...

[–] danc4498 4 points 3 days ago
load more comments (25 replies)
[–] [email protected] 67 points 3 days ago (5 children)

At least europe it has kind of switched to the opposite in recent years.

I did a doctorate in physics and women had a much easier time finding PhD/post-doc positions because there is just much more funding available.

Most groups in my institution were majority women.

Professorships are still nearly all men, but that's largely down to the sexism of the previous generations (back in the 60s-90s when they got their positions). This will slowly shift in the coming decades.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

I can somewhat confirm your first statement.

I began my Master's study a few years ago and had to retake a course since I've switched to another university and they claimed that my Bachelor's study wasn't equal to theirs. A female friend of mine did the exact same and had exactly the same education as me. The dean of our new study wrote her personally and said that he will make sure that she doesn't have to retake any courses if she starts studying here. I'm still kinda pissed about that tbh.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Yey, reversed sexism ! That sure will solve every problem !

Can't we just treat people as equal ?

[–] SmoothOperator 3 points 2 days ago

We literally can't, not while the structures we live in are built to benefit men.

Equality will only come with structural change, which at times will look like reverse sexism. But if a woman is hired with half the publications, and it is twice as hard for a woman to get published (just as a fictional example), then it's not really reverse sexism even if it looks like that on the surface.

[–] Anamnesis 19 points 3 days ago

In the US this is true in academic philosophy and probably the humanities more generally. Women get tenure track positions with, on average, half the number of publications that men have. Most tenured professors are men, but it's slowly changing as the strong preference for women at the junior levels percolates upward. Within the next twenty or thirty years we'll need to address the bias against men in junior positions or we're going to end up with the same problem but in reverse.

[–] Telodzrum 11 points 3 days ago

This was my wife’s experience while in her doctoral program in the States, as well. The structural misogyny and firm barriers to career progression kicked in when she moved to the private sector afterwards.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Outside of a few niches like computer science this is increasingly true in the US as well AFAIK.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Interesting how computer science is an outlier here when (IIRC) the first programmers were women.

At least math being outlier "makes sense".

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I blame (in no small part) Hollywood and movies like Jurassic Park for pushing stereotypes about the field being dominated by creepy, obese, and gross "computer nerds."

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

Damn it, the stereotype is basically me

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 days ago

I mean I can say for the us, 35 years ago my bachelors program for microbiology had a majority of men but there were still a lot of women. 30 years ago in a PhD they accepted 4men and 4woman but one guy never showed, another dropped mid first semester, another dropped between semester, and I dropped mid second semester. As of that time all four women stayed in the program but I know one was thinking of switching (non of the men continued to seek a doctorate). I worked in diagnostic assays a bit but saw the same thing. More women to begin with and guys left in droves. Most got mbas and did managagement or went for tech jobs.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I'm sure this will turn into a men vs women comment section ; which is exactly the problem because it's actually rich vs. poor.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 days ago

It's rich men versus everyone. The rich men are doing a good job of making people think it's something different

[–] nifty 2 points 2 days ago

Nah, I think it’s impt to just know that we can all just live however we choose, no one should tell us anyone can just be one way

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Stoopid smart wamen!

load more comments
view more: next ›