Late Stage Capitalism

574 readers

2265 users here now

A place for for news, discussion, memes, and links criticizing capitalism and advancing viewpoints that challenge liberal capitalist ideology. That means any support for any liberal capitalist political party (like the Democrats) is strictly prohibited.

A zero-tolerance policy for bigotry of any kind. Failure to respect this will result in a ban.

RULES:

1 Understand the left starts at anti-capitalism.

2 No Trolling

3 No capitalist apologia, anti-socialism, or liberalism, liberalism is in direct conflict with the left. Support for capitalism or for the parties or ideologies that uphold it are not welcome or tolerated.

4 No imperialism, conservatism, reactionism or Zionism, lessor evil rhetoric. Dismissing 3rd party votes or 'wasted votes on 3rd party' is lessor evil rhetoric.

5 No bigotry, no racism, sexism, antisemitism, homophobia, transphobia, ableism, or any type of prejudice.

6 Be civil in comments and no accusations of being a bot, 'paid by Putin,' Tankie, etc.

founded 4 months ago

MODERATORS

anticolonialist

K1nsey6

Are you better value for money than AI? (go.theregister.com)

submitted 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) by [email protected] to c/latestagecapitalism

4 comments fedilink hide all child comments

cross-posted from: https://ponder.cat/post/1081067

In the past, the rhetoric was all about increasing productivity. Now headcount is coming into focus. Companies like OpenAI have begun to openly acknowledge the implications: why recruit more people when there's an AI for that? And do you really need all those employees?

OpenAI did not respond to a request for comment by The Register. Microsoft did not wish to make a statement on the record. ®

They're not even trying to hide it now

top 4 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] Skyrmir 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I've seen what AI can do in my field. It can replace a new guy, straight out of college. It can't replace the same guy with 6 months of experience in the job. If it's a job that anyone with basic skills and no field knowledge could do, then AI can do it. If it might require a discussion to get it right, the AI will never get it done right.

So it is a big threat to jobs, and it's going to destroy companies that over depend on it out of the gate. But hey, if you get out before the company collapses, it's not your fault right?

[–] Evolith 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Agreed, to an extent. Like what we saw with Coke's AI commercial, companies are eager to do anything that will cut their costs while maintaining profits. If it can seemingly replace a salaried position, they'll do it just to lump that amount of annual grand into the profit pile multiplied by however many people they replace with a pile of code. Who knows how long it will take them to analyze and assess if the marketing/data-entry/creative quality dip is worth the ratio in boosted profit margins.

Which, dystopically and sadly, polarizes safe human work into either menial physical labor that codeshit cannot perform but is necessary to be done (janitorial, warehouses, logistics, maintenance, construction, bodily care, etc.) or license-authorized professional work gatekept by organized legislation, boards, and the obscenely rich (law, healthcare, academics, government, private research, etc.)

Unless a legal damper is placed on AI, we're in for a really, really dim future for diverse job field employment.

[–] Skyrmir 1 points 3 weeks ago

Yep, there's a path to a post scarcity world due to AI, but a canyon of dystopian nightmare between here and there. Economists are going to be gathering some amazingly interesting data over the next few decades. It's just going to really suck to be part of that data.

[–] sudo42 2 points 3 weeks ago

OpenAI did not respond to a request for comment by The Register. Microsoft did not wish to make a statement on the record.

Wait. Neither OpenAI nor Microsoft had an AI craft the perfect response to a journalist's questions?

Next you'll be telling me that Tesla's "self driving" cars don't deliver themselves, but actually are delivered to dealerships on an 18-wheeler driven by a human.