Pine64's Pinetime

219 readers

1 users here now

Community for Pine64's PineTime!

Come and share watchface, tips and tricks and more for the PineTime!

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

Krafting

Imagine if the Pinetime Has Longer Software Support than the Apple Watch Series 4's Mere 6 years (lemmy.ca)

submitted 2 months ago by [email protected] to c/pinetime

7 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Despite the hardware limitations, it would be amazing to watch the community continue to add new features and fix bugs past the 7 years mark.

The project has 141 contributors, 50 patches and 2800 stars on github and 1393 members in the matrix channel.

I'm really impressed that the watch gets 2-3 updates a year with the screenshots showing an advanced operating system despite the low spec sheet.

It would really be a bad look for Apple when the original Pinetime (Nordic Semiconductor nRF52832 64MHz 32-bit CPU, 240x240 LCD IPS, 512KB + 4MB STORAGE, 64KB RAM, 170-180 mAh BATTERY, 5.0/LE BLUETOOTH, Accelerometer, Heart rate sensor SENSORS) outlasts the Series 4 longevity-wise (Apple S4 Dual-core 64-bit CPU, PowerVR GPU, 448x368 pixels OLED, 16GB STORAGE, 1GB RAM 292 mAh, 5.0/LE BLUETOOTH, Accelerometer, Gyro, Heart Rate, Barometer SENSORS)

Whats the point of having all that beefy hardware if Apple doesn't fully utilize it and locks the new features/watch faces behind the new models to get you to spend more. Meanwhile the Pinetime has a unlocked bootloader with multiple operating systems to choose from.

Before I heard the project, I was planning to get the Apple Watch Ultra 4 in 2026 with blood glucose tracking but I now know the Pinetime is a much better choice in the end since the watch is much cheaper and the open source nature greatly hastens the innovation and takes full advantage of the hardware.

top 7 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

Oh, I see a new release... I should update mine

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

For anyone who wants to read the history of the development, Pinetime spec sheet and full documentation.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Lmk if you get one. I looked at it last month and was led astray by a bad review. I'm in the market for something like this as I'm wanting love a more active lifestyle but I really don't want to buy a Fitbit or something similar.

Total not on topic have you heard of https://banglejs.com/ ?

[–] semperverus 4 points 2 months ago

To be clear, with the default OS, you don't get true 24/7 heart rate tracking. You can simulate it though by turning the heart rate monitor "app" on and backing out of it without stopping it, and then make sure you have the wake on movement options enabled.

The pinetime is a very basic smart watch. It is not fancy in any stretch of the imagination. It shows the text of notifications only, does very basic heart rate monitoring, and you have to manually go into a different "app" to do multimedia controls. You'll notice I'm saying app in quotes. They're more like built-in function menus, you can't install new apps.

But despite all that, I have never had a watch this refreshingly good to use. I have had 2 WearOS watches and work gave me a demo Apple Watch to show customers. All of them were nice, but all of them had that enshittification ooze leaking out of them.

Pinetime is simple. It works. It simply works. And for that, I love it.

Oh and the week-long battery is nice too.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago

I have been using one with an alternate OS / Privacy focused setup of older hardware (Pixel 7 with Graphene, older Bluetooth headphones and a Pinetime). Switching back and forth between that config and a pretty current Samsung config.

It's interesting how much of the current smartwatch features are really just bloat in my day to day. I really only want to track steps, heartbeat when needed and receive messages.

I can do most of that with either and the battery life + simple design of the Pinetime has me considering a full move to their platform (phone, watch, buds).

I run bangle for most of my advanced config and it's decent. Makes some of the under the hood stuff a bit easier.

I think for the price of a pinewatch most users who are already looking at the hardware will get at least their investment back on checking the platform out and dipping in to the community around it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Lmk if you get one. I looked at it last month and was led astray by a bad review. I’m in the market for something like this as I’m wanting love a more active lifestyle but I really don’t want to buy a Fitbit or something similar.

What aspect did the review criticize the most about the watch if I may ask?

Total not on topic have you heard of https://banglejs.com/ ?

I haven't but I will have to look at that link now that you have brought it up.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

I believe it was build quality and the lack of a way to export workouts or something to that effect. (Ty for looking past my spelling and grammer 😅)