this post was submitted on 13 Dec 2024
-35 points (31.2% liked)

Political Memes

5598 readers
1774 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 days ago

My understanding is that people are put on the cover of time magazine not because of how ethical or moral they are but because of how much influence and power they have. So Trump being on the cover on Time magazine doesn't mean they are saying he's a good person.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

And remember, this is the same magazine that once had Hitler as person of the year. Mistakes do happen.

[–] TaTTe 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It's not a mistake. The person of the year is not by definition a good person, but someone who's had a lot of influence during the year, for better or for worse.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

Fair enough.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It's okay if you don't know what it means to make time's person of the year.

Just don't pretend like that level of nuance is something you do grasp.

[–] PolydoreSmith 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

You have to admit the title “Person of the Year” does carry with it a certain gravitas, just by virtue of the way those words are used in every other instance. Game of the Year, Movie of the Year, etc are all superlatives - regardless of whether they can hide behind the plausible deniability of their own definition.

They have nothing to lose by not putting a criminal oligarch on the front cover. Bet it made Time a lot of money though so, ya know, that’s what matters.

This similar to how Rogan justifies platforming Nazis and conspiracy nuts. And anyway, it’s not really even “news”; it’s just a long opinion piece with facts sprinkled in.

[–] Hobbes_Dent 10 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Interesting.

I think it’s being downvoted because it’s not a meme, but news.

[–] MyPornViewingAccount 13 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Id have downvoted either way.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

might sound like a stupid question but why? what makes it worth a downvote? I hate this ancient apes stupid ass too but what does the post represent that warrants a down vote /gen

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

i don't like seeing his rancid turd face, simple as