And Finally...

This doesn't effect me, I don't shop at Walmart or have more than six holes.

Besides banning the sale of sex toys, the Texas Obscenity Statute also specified the number of “obscene devices”—for example, dildos—a person could own: six. The number was not chosen at random, but rather because lawmakers assumed that people who owned more than six obscene devices that were identical or similar had the intent to distribute them.

Theoretically, it should be possible to have more than six obscene devices without by guilty of intending to supply them - cock ring, butt plug, fleshlight, dildo, strap-on, inflatable sheep, Ben Wa balls, nipple clamps and penis cage. All have different uses, all without intending to supply.

If supply was the concern (although I don't know why), perhaps criminalise that not the bottom drawer of my bedside table.

IANAL, but this law is (probably) not currently enforceable due to (among others) Lawrence v. Texas.

However, that was explicitly named as being on the chopping block, so at best it's "not enforceable yet"

Great, now where am I gonna find BestValue dildos

Rules for thee but not for me, eh Sen. Cruz?

Need to make a proposal to limit cross walls to a maximum of 6 crosses.

Hairbrush and shampoo bottle sales about to go through the roof.

And yet they have such unearned pride as a bastion of freedumb.

Someone needs to make a Swiss army dildo.

They'll have to come and take them from my cold dead pu-... wait..

Oh, good. Bob is still safe.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6fZkTd2-dAE (or your friendly privacy friendly service preferably)