It's beyond discouraging to think that so many people are dying just because a little sociopath is attempting to compensate.
Ukraine
News and discussion related to Ukraine
*Sympathy for enemy combatants is prohibited.
*No content depicting extreme violence or gore.
*Posts containing combat footage should include [Combat] in title
*Combat videos containing any footage of a visible human must be flagged NSFW
Server Rules
- Remember the human! (no harassment, threats, etc.)
- No racism or other discrimination
- No Nazis, QAnon or similar
- No porn
- No ads or spam (includes charities)
- No content against Finnish law
Donate to support Ukraine's Defense
Donate to support Humanitarian Aid
And it's not like russia is doing any better either. 198k dead. The saddening part is, due to state sponsered news, a LARGE portion of russians SUPPORT the war. Somehow thinking it's Ukraine's fault for existing. They call Ukraine nazis, despite being led by a jew. They use the fact that Ukraine has a large russian speaking populace as justification to reunite. That's LITERALLY a page out of Hitler's playbook.
It just saddens me that so much death and destruction must come just to appease one man, and I use the word lightly, who doesn't even give one shit about his own citizens.
And now Trumps "peace deal" is basically going to be "give russia everything"
Most if not all wars starts with a little sociopath wanting to have more that what he has.
Goddammit, it’s just not right. I know we (the west) do a lot already to help Ukraine. But honestly we need to do more. Ukrainians are fighting for their right to merely exist!! The Ukrainians do not deserve this, and we need to do everything we can to stop Russia. They are doing harm all over the world, and if the Russian federation collapses from losing the war, we get rid of Russia undermining everything everywhere else.
Slava Ukraini
I don't understand why we don't put troops in cities and say fight away from civilians or commit an act of war against our soldiers
Because they don't want to actually go to war. Russia would bomb the cities as normal, and some of those troops would get injured/killed, but a retaliatory attack by any member of NATO would be viewed as an offensive, and void of article 5 needing to be enacted or followed. If one did use retaliatory strikes Russia would cry about being the victim like always.
The reason UN troops were not there to do such was because Russia has the ability to veto them stepping in. That took place in February 2022
Historically that hasn't gone well.
And at what point do you hand a city over? If the Ukrainians lose the ground around it, are you going to try and do an enclave? Or does it get handed over? What's the actual goal? Protecting civilians or protecting Ukraine? Because militarily cities are fantastic defensive ground, requiring years to fully occupy if they're properly contested. So you'd also be taking away some great defensive terrain.