this post was submitted on 08 Dec 2024
34 points (84.0% liked)

Games

32906 readers
1669 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] caut_R 31 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I‘m happy for the devs, but I shudder at the signal this sends to publishers regarding liveservice, „we just gotta keep trying, guys!“

[–] Thekingoflorda 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Mwah, the game is apparently fairly lenient on microtransactions. I hope the signal is: “maybe out liveservice game shouldn’t be utter crap”.

[–] ampersandrew 5 points 1 week ago

That didn't save plenty of other games either. So everyone is going to keep chasing this dragon to their own demise.

[–] ChicoSuave 6 points 1 week ago

Concord also happened this year. The message will be "we gotta be careful".

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago (3 children)

And thats why the slop keeps on coming and there is nothing any of us can do about it

[–] ampersandrew 19 points 1 week ago

Sure there is: spend your time and money elsewhere.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 week ago

FWIW I really like this one. It doesn't beat your head with microtransactions and it avoids FOMO by allowing you to always access previous seasons' passes. Also every character is unlocked by default.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If you can't have fun then no one can, right?

[–] TheFeatureCreature 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Considering the amount of gambling, exploitative practices, dark patterns, etc that exists in modern live-service games - saying that comes across as rather disingenuous.

It is good to hear this particular live-service game is bucking some of the recent trends, but I think it is safe to say these types of games, in general, have done damage to the industry and the wallets and minds of players. Enjoy yourselves, but be cautious and don't let your guard down because these companies will screw you if they think they can. We have seen it so many times.

[–] ampersandrew 6 points 1 week ago

Beyond that, live service games are designed to delete themselves off the face of the earth when they stop making money rather than being a piece of the history of the medium we can revisit.

[–] warmaster 5 points 1 week ago

I tried it, it's fairly decent. Although imho, they went with quantity over quality.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

I think it's a solid hit. Teamup mechanic is really interesting and actually impacts the match. Team rosters feel more flexible vs OW where specific counters are needed in most cases. I think the art style is a huge win too. It's consistent across animation, static images, charachter design etc. They didn't just use existing assets. Microtransactions aren't shoved in your face. And I love how the battlepass let's you pick and choose what you want.

Balancing characters will take time, there's some QoL things I'd like to see, and the crashes need fixing, but really solid out the gate.