this post was submitted on 04 Dec 2024
238 points (93.8% liked)

politics

19168 readers
4028 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] just_another_person 20 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

Biden needs to use the insane powers bestowed upon the Presidency to limit the incoming one. Full fucking stop.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (2 children)

This is a terrifying precedent, though. If it becomes demonstratable that a sitting president can ignore the vote and veto the election, then every president from then until the end of time can argue against the "damage" the next president will cause. This was Hitler claiming "emergency powers," and you will immediately have a dictatorship, not a democracy.

I'm not saying another Trump presidency is "fine" by any regard, but I don't believe in being a fascist to prevent fascism.

[–] just_another_person 4 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

It's already happened. It can't be undone.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

The Supreme Court could be undone.

[–] just_another_person 0 points 23 hours ago

Not in this political climate. Dafuq you talking about?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 23 hours ago

A straightforward way to protect people from fascists would be to get them out of prisons where they will otherwise be easy targets.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

I also would like one order of a "full unconditional pardon of any crime that I may or may not have committed, from [date of my birth] to [date of my death], and also pardon all my debts and taxes also effective from the same time period please."

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] yesman 4 points 22 hours ago (3 children)

This would have been productive with a blue-ribbon commission and 2 years. But Biden should totally be able to hammer it out one rainy morning.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (1 children)

But Biden should totally be able to hammer it out one rainy morning.

Why not? Democrats should use the power of the government to improve people's lives.

edit: looks like lemmy downtime caused a double post

[–] Ensign_Crab 1 points 18 hours ago

Democrats should use the power of the government to improve people’s lives.

That would be out of character for them.

[–] Ensign_Crab 1 points 18 hours ago

He could at least pardon as many as he can get to.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

XD They need to give him his aviators, it's way too bright out there for him. I would probably be squinting too lol. edit: typo

[–] distantsounds 2 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Pardon everyone, make everyone a billionaire, and banish climate change with the last wish.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 21 hours ago

Why is doing a useful thing to help people always framed as being unreasonable but nepotism is celebrated?

[–] Illegalmexicant -1 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

I feel like that if one pardon commits a crime, it will be spun like illegal immigrants where one person's actions defines the group.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 21 hours ago

How about instead of letting Republicans control the narrative we point out how immigrants have been treated unfairly by the system and tell everyone we think the pardon is a great idea. People are doing it for Hunter Biden why not immigrants?

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›