Politics

358 readers

86 users here now

For civil discussion of US politics. Be excellent to each other.

Rule 1: Posts have the following requirements:
▪️ Post articles about the US only

▪️ Title must match the article headline

▪️ Recent (Past 30 Days)

▪️ No Screenshots/links to other social media sites or link shorteners

Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. One or two small paragraphs are okay.

Rule 3: Articles based on opinion (unless clearly marked and from a serious publication-No Fox News or equal), misinformation or propaganda will be removed.

Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, ableist, will be removed.

Rule 5: Keep it civil. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a jerk. It’s not acceptable to say another user is a jerk. Cussing is fine.

Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.

USAfacts.org

The Alt-Right Playbook

Media owners, CEOs and/or board members

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

The Supreme Court will soon decide whether states can ban gender-affirming care for trans minors (www.salon.com)

submitted 3 weeks ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

5 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The Supreme Court is set to hear one of the most important trans rights cases in history on Wednesday, with the nation's highest court set to decide whether a state-level ban on gender-affirming care for minors is an unconstitutional form of sex discrimination.

The ban in question, passed by Tennessee's Republican-led legislature in the form of SB1, prevents doctors from prescribing puberty blockers, hormone treatment or surgery to minors experiencing gender dysphoria. The same medications can be prescribed to cisgender teens who go through puberty too early or too late, but not for those who feel uncomfortable with their assigned gender.

top 5 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] athairmor 11 points 3 weeks ago

We’re about to see just how much they value personal liberty vs. the power of the state.

[–] Feathercrown 8 points 3 weeks ago

There's no way they stop the states from deciding

[–] ceenote 8 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

That what state you live in determines what rights you get has been the conservative position since before the Civil War.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

If I would live in a red state, I already would have moved to a blue one and started to organise people to demonstrate for the state leaving US and getting an independent state. I would not want to live in such a facist country like USA is right now…

I’m so fucking lucky to live where I do…

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

Independent state? Nah, they're imploding on their own.