The new coordinate system is moving one meter per second in the x-direction. This is small enough compared to the speed of light that we can ignore relativity. So the mass is the same and the velocity and momentum just get shifted by one meter per second, no?
this post was submitted on 28 Nov 2024
3 points (66.7% liked)
Physics
1332 readers
14 users here now
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Regarding the third body, consider the case where its mass is, say, 2 kg, and the case where it's 1 kg instead (the momentum being the same).
Yes we're considering Newtonian mechanics in any case. What I'm especially curious about is what physical principles people use to motivate their answers.
You dont have sufficient information to calculate the momentum of the third body in the new system. If you are treating the system as Newtonian you need the mass of it to calculate its momentum in the new frame, if you are treating it as relativistic you need its total energy.
Completely agree, which I think is very interesting. In Newtonian mechanics, some scalar and vector quantities such as mass, internal energy, contact forces (stress), heat flux are frame-indifferent. Others, such as velocity and acceleration, are frame-dependent but we do have transformation rules for them. Some quantities – and quite important ones – such as momentum, are in a sort of limbo: they are frame-dependent, but there's no clear transformation rule for them.
From the point of view of relativity theory, it's interesting to note that for this particular case of coordinate transformation – note that it is not a Lorentz boost – we can actually calculate the spatial components of momentum in the new coordinate system, if the reported momentum is expressed as a covariant vector (p_µ). This is because its unknown temporal component (energy) gets multiplied by zero in this transformation. But the text is ambiguous on whether the reported components are covariant or contravariant.