this post was submitted on 13 Nov 2024
53 points (98.2% liked)

politics

19115 readers
3805 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

On Reddit, there was a post that outlined why this rando voted for Trump that had thousands of upvotes.

The major complaint was the constant noise about things like BLM, DEI, LGBTQ, defund the police and hating private prisons.

I can understand if this racist hates the first half. And I can understand if they also love sucking off cops.

But why the fuck would anybody support a private prison? Literally a company that makes money off of people being punished?

[–] Zombiepirate 11 points 1 week ago

Because they're certain that the people getting punished are heretics to their reactionary ideology.

They see it as inferior people getting what they deserve, and since it's privatized they imagine they'll pay less for the privilege.

[–] A_Random_Idiot 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I forsee criticism of trump being a arrestable offense in the near future, to fill out prison populations so prisoners can be used to replace the labor lost by the mass deportations.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Conservatives will have a majority in all branches. Repealing or revising constitutional amendments isn't out of the question, and there's a lot of damage they can do before midterms (if there's even a chance to vote in different people).

[–] A_Random_Idiot 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

hes already talking civil war and invading blue states with the national guard from red states.

The countries fucked.

and Democrats will just sit on the wayside watching, not learning anything, not changing anything.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Based on their "assessment" of why they lost (specifically the politicians and DNC), I'm inclined to agree.

I hope there's people on the left working to provide a populist candidate, because I haven't seen anything even remotely suggesting that's happening, and I don't see how we can hope to fix shit without it.

[–] A_Random_Idiot 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

brave of you to think we'll have another election.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

My original comment said as much. No point repeating myself.

I think we'll have midterms, but I'm less optimistic about 2028.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

Yay for prison slave labor advocates and private prisons. /s

This is terrible. Seems like prisons are about to be overflowing with homeless people.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

Sherman Tanz finally bought a president.