this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2023
136 points (100.0% liked)

BrainWorms

1224 readers
23 users here now

Hey, welcome to BrainWorms.

This is a place where I post interesting things that I find and cant categorize into one of the main subs I follow. Enjoy a front seat as i descend into madness

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Interesting, to be sure:

Outside observers say that the numbers don’t add up behind Disney’s decision to take down the shows and claim a $1.5 billion impairment charge. That’s because Disney is claiming two contradictory things: both that the assets were producing so little value that it’s cheaper to destroy them than to keep them and that the assets were worth $1.5 billion.

“I cannot figure out how they can possibly get to $1.5 billion, because they should have almost no unamortized costs” under the 2017 tax bill, said David Offenberg, a professor of entertainment industry finance at Loyola Marymount University.

[–] givesomefucks 30 points 1 year ago (1 children)

A big part is there's apparently nothing requiring them to disclose streaming numbers

So it's like how trump does his taxes. They just claim whatever benefits th in the moment. So as a "loss" it's worth a shitton, but as a "profit" it's worth nothing.

It's why actor/writer residuals are so shit, the billion dollar companies do t have to tell anyone how much it actually costs or makes.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Regulators and investors are behind the curve in regard to entertainment technology. Big business is taking advantage of everything not written into an ironclad contract.

Their big move upcoming is offloading as much as they can from D+ to Hulu, because if the contract only discusses streaming on D+ than there are no royalties to pay through Hulu.

[–] reddig33 2 points 1 year ago

Actors barely make any residuals from streaming, so this sounds like more magical “Hollywood accounting”.

Breaking up the studios to introduce more competition would help. The same company owns the production studio, the content, the streaming channel, the cable channel, and the broadcast channel. Some studios even own the cable lines, set top box, and/or internet connection. It’s ridiculous.

[–] pwnicholson 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And this is why I wish stuff was still released on physical media and I always prefer to own it outright.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago

SSD’s/HDD’s have never been cheaper! Yar!

[–] elbowdrop 7 points 1 year ago

Use ebay. How else was I going to find Going Overboard. Adam Saddlers first and best movie. I wanna slap your cat.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

I guess streaming is going to die.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What are they getting rid of?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

They removed the new Willow series, among other things

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

As a massive Willow fan since 1988, that show sucked. Didn't even make it halfway through.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I liked it. Not great, but good fun.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I heard that did very poorly.

Too bad they won't remove the Star Wars sequels.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

why would they? last jedi is ESB and ROTS tier amazing

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

I see what you did there.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Bob OGRE is more like it. Sheesh. This doesn't bode well for the striking actors and writers, who want fair compensation for their work. The film studios would much rather have things the way things are on YouTube, where Google gets all its content for free and makes the content providers think that it's doing THEM a favor by hosting it.