this post was submitted on 11 Nov 2024
497 points (97.9% liked)

politics

19088 readers
4178 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago (15 children)

I couldnt care less for the why. If you voted Trump, a third party candidate or not at all you are responsible for the coming fascism you waste of cells

[–] surph_ninja 2 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

There it is. Liberals are so comfortable moving straight to fascism the moment they don’t get what they want.

Gee I wonder why your fascist centrism didn’t resonate with anyone.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 22 hours ago

Oh! I see where you misunderstood. No, Trump -the Putin worshipping, endorsed by Duterte, wannabe dictator- is the fascism that will be more unchecked than the first time he was elected. They were referring to the immediate next two years, not any hope of a come back where fascist policies like policing women's bodies or banning lgbta+ rights will be attempted to be repealed.

They're talking about the ones who openly worship dictators, not the liberals that currently have no control.

[–] eskimofry 3 points 1 day ago

Ah the Highly intellectual argument that liberals use to win over voters... or is it?

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] Fedizen 71 points 2 days ago (16 children)

trump only picked up 500,000 more votes than last time. Lets hear from the 10,000,000 that voted in 2020 but not this election

[–] TempermentalAnomaly 9 points 1 day ago

Why does this even matter? We have an electoral college and turnout in the seven swings state met or exceeded 2020 turnout.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago

Those people could only be motivated to vote when it was as easy as possible and they had nothing better to do. They voted for the party that would handle COVID better and let them get back to their lives of not worrying about politics.

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] roguetrick 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I honestly doubt people who vote for AOC and Trump in her district are in any way representative of the swing state voters that actually decide the election. Engagement is what went wrong, obviously, but how it went wrong in those two places can be very different.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jpreston2005 36 points 2 days ago (7 children)

I think long COVID has impacted more Americans than we realize. Everyone out there suffering from diminished capacities thinking that the fascist sex-pest goomba is somehow more reliable than the nice black lady. I dunno about you guys, but I've just been seeing a whole lot of mistakes lately. On television, in News, in articles, just... everywhere.

And while a lot of it is probably people quiet quitting and not giving a fuck, I think a lot more people are suffering from the extended brain fog of long COVID than we think, and it's affecting everything around us. Unfortunately, that includes voting practices in elections.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

mine isn't a brain fog but COVID and a trump presidency made me not trust humans at all.

i no longer trust friends, family, neighbors, governments, leaders, police, doctors, businesses. none of them maintained trust during the Trump presidency and the pandemic.

but i still vote straight ticket democrat. because their platform doesn't include NAZI-ism

The NYTimes wrote it out for me:

The playbook for transforming a democracy into a soft autocracy was clear: Win power with a populist message against elites. Redraw parliamentary districts. Change voting laws. Harass civil society. Pack courts with judges willing to support power grabs. Enrich cronies through corruption. Buy up newspapers and television stations and turn them into right-wing propaganda. Use social media to energize supporters. Wrap it up in an Us versus Them message: Us, the “real” Russians or Hungarians or Americans, against a rotating cast of Them: the migrants, the Muslims, the liberals, the gays, George Soros and on and on.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] GuyDudeman 329 points 2 days ago (18 children)

Good analysis:

"Ppl like her because she’s real. Ppl perceive Trump as real too. Dems need to do a better job of just being real with ppl. Coming on social media and chatting with ppl, etc."

That's why people liked Bernie too.

[–] [email protected] 282 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (7 children)

AOC is real.

But DJT is the most fictional character who's ever existed. Nothing he's ever said, done, or been has been true.

Sadly, we're stuck in the reality that allows his falsehoods to affect real humans.

[–] jaggedrobotpubes 3 points 1 day ago

He does not use politics speak. That's all.

But you're right, it's a very good distinction.

[–] billiam0202 141 points 2 days ago (14 children)

Well, like the quoted person said:

Ppl perceive Trump as real too.

Now, I have no idea how anyone could possibly think that, unless they only get Trump sanewashed by their favorite news outlet.

[–] AA5B 5 points 1 day ago

I wonder if we listen to Trump more than they do. I have a hard time believing people can listen to him speak and come out with ideas like “he’s real”, “telling it like it is”, “he’ll do better with the economy”. Ok, maybe the last one because people are dumb

People here always talk about conservatives getting their news from Facebook or Fox.

But the connection I didn’t make until way too recently….. maybe they don’t know any politics firsthand. My Facebook tells me Trump is “telling it like it is”, so I don’t need to listen to him

load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 79 points 2 days ago (10 children)

Whoever was running Harris campaign needs to be barred from being in charge of any political campaign ever again; talk about legendary levels of mismanagement.

They had the golden opportunity to lean into the ‘weird’ meme and hammer Trump/Vance on that issue - but decided against it because it was what, ‘demeaning’?

The Dems need a firebrand, with a truely populist message and policies; rather than just lip service.

[–] chaonaut 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

For whatever reason, when I'm hearing about Dems in the swing state I'm in, I'm hardly ever hearing why you should be excited to vote for the Dem candidate, but instead why the Rep candidate is so awful that you simply must vote Dem to stop them. Like, there was about a week(?) that Harris and Walz seemed to be coming out of the gate going "we're gonna be so awesome, don't even worry about the weirdos on the other side", but then it became "please, it is of Vital Importance you do not vote for Trump, we promise Harris will be better than him", and I just don't understand why they changed.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago

When Walz was picked I really thought we would see a sliver of actual leftist ideology in their platform.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)
[–] LANIK2000 43 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Jesus christ, this is what unaffordable education does to people. For fucks sake. I mean it's only fitting for a population that can't figure out that someone advertising a 1/3lb burger and directly comparing it to the competition 1/4lb, bragging about the price being the same, might indicate that 1/3lb is more despite 3 being a smaller number. What a combination, people that belive their thoughts are the only source of truth while having no clue what they're talking about.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 133 points 2 days ago (1 children)

If you voted for trump and AOC you need to make sure you never leave home without your fucking helmet on. Fuck.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] LovingHippieCat 154 points 2 days ago (14 children)

This is fucking nuts. Some of those answers are people being so uninformed and then acting like they're the ones that are informed. Some even voted for Trump because they think he's anti-war and will stop the Genocide in Gaza despite him wanting to turbocharge it. It's just. Fucking depressing. I don't know how to counter this. The far right has created a media ecosystem that allows them to feed trash into their viewers brains even if it's a blatant lie and those people will go from voting for a blatant racist and fascist who thinks people of color are not real Americans, to voting for a left leaning woman of color.

It's almost like they don't have any actual morals or beliefs and only care about being anti-establishment. Some say they'd vote for Bernie but instead voted for Trump despite them being completely opposite people. These people don't have media literacy. They've been brainwashed, and I don't know how to fix it.

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] Intergalactic 92 points 2 days ago (31 children)

I appreciate the value of honesty and authenticity as key reasons people choose to support a candidate.

However, it is clear that Donald Trump often makes false statements.

Furthermore, Kamala Harris might have benefited from participating in more contemporary media formats, such as podcasts and Twitch streams, to enhance her outreach. Additionally, focusing less on appealing to Republican voters might have been advantageous, as this strategy CLEARLY contributed to her electoral loss.

load more comments (31 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›