Ubisoft... No thanks
this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2023
36 points (89.1% liked)
Games
16950 readers
454 users here now
Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)
Posts.
- News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
- Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
- No humor/memes etc..
- No affiliate links
- No advertising.
- No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
- No self promotion.
- No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
- No politics.
Comments.
- No personal attacks.
- Obey instance rules.
- No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
- Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.
My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.
Other communities:
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Sounds a bit like a jab at BG3s length.
I thought they were talking about Valhalla.
That's exactly what I thought. They've been criticized for years about making pointlessly enormous games like Valhalla and Far Cry 6.
Valhalla only sucked because the grind you needed to fight any post mid game bosses would cause any sensible gamer to quit, far cry 6 was lit tho and if they do star wars like far cry 6 it would be good.
I actually finished Far Cry 6 recently, it ain't that big at all, like 20 hours max. It doesn't even have too many outposts had has no real towers at all.
Exactly what I was thinking.
Seems like other devs would love the amount of freedom and time to build a massive RPG and praise it instead of taking petty swipes at it.
Good
"You'll pay more for getting less and you'll like it!"
I'll believe it when I see it.