Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.
1. English only
Title and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original link
Post URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communication
All communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. Inclusivity
Everyone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacks
Any kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangents
Stay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may apply
If something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.
[email protected]
[email protected]
Icon attribution | Banner attribution
talk about running before youre even freakin conceived. we cant 'teleport' a single molecule
Can teleport anything? An atom, perhaps?
A brief, limited form of information of sorts. That's all.
nope. just not possible with our current tech. im not aware of any tech that even lets you deposit an atom at a location on demand merely simulating 'teleportation'
The idea behind it is to do it at the subatomic level. And no, that's not how the quantum locking works. I have not read the article but it's likely by someone who doesn't know shit about shit.
There was talk about teleporting a photon, but it was a mathematically possible (but technologically impossible) theory. A whole human is a pipedream.
I seem to remember researchers teleporting an atom like a decade ago. But then I never heard about it again.
Because it was nowhere to be found after the teleport.
No seriously, I remember that too, but I think it was a photon.
OK but a photon isn't an atom.
Complete BS article.
Quantum teleportation is very different from scifi teleportation.
Quantum teleportation is a way to bypass the heisenburg uncertainty principal. You take a particle and entangle it (in a special way) with a carrier particle. You then send the carrier (generally a photon) to another particle of the same type as the first. When they interact, most of the properties of the first particle are transferred to the second.
This is extremely useful for things like quantum computing, but has no real path to teleporting a human.
There’s just one catch: every atom in your body would be fully disassembled to the quantum level, effectively leaving your original body totally destroyed.
So just like Star Trek
I would absolutely volunteer for this, abso-friggin-lutely.
If I die in the process, I'm not gonna know it, and new me ain't gonna either. At least that's how I see it.
Now that trump won ill even volunteer to go first LOL.
You should read The Jaunt to acquire the completely healthy and rational fear of teleportation
Ha! Came here to tell OP it's probably a longer trip than he thinks.
That story gives me chills every time I think about the woman.
I teleported home one day,
With Ron and Sid and Meg.
Ron stole Meggy's heart away
And I got Sidney's leg
Even if they manage this, I'll bet "you" die each time something 'effectively ... destroy[s]" you down to a quantum level.
That depends on the nature of what "you" ultimately turn out to be. I tend to suspect (though with only a suspicion to go on and not proof, I probably wouldn't be volunteering) that what "you" ultimately are is the pattern of information stored in the structure of your brain, and thus, any sufficiently perfect copy of that information is the "same" person regardless of continuity of the body. Though creating a second copy before destroying the original would have the caveat that as soon as the second you exists, the different perspective and experience will lead them to diverge into two different people who both have equal claim to the original identity, so that I think to do this, you'd want to destroy the original slightly before, making the process more like resurrection in a new location.
We are easily thousands of years away from genuinely understanding this stuff. Right now we have absolutely no clue.
There really should be a way around that part of things, maybe if the distance is short enough you could move particles instead of recreating them
Bet they come out like doodlebob
It'd be easier to control wormholes and use those