this post was submitted on 05 Nov 2024
219 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

59665 readers
3556 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] RonnieB 27 points 3 weeks ago

But it's just cosmetic! /s

[–] [email protected] 23 points 2 weeks ago

Cant buy cosmetics when your pirated copy cant connect to the internet! Problem solved😸

[–] [email protected] 19 points 3 weeks ago

That’s every digital marketplace.

[–] Zorque 7 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Ah yes, the games are the problem, not the system in which they are created.

It's the video games that are the problem. Clearly.

[–] ilmagico 6 points 2 weeks ago

It's the video games makers really, not video games as a whole. There are ways to make video games without getting kids to spend their parents' money.

[–] daddy32 3 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

In this case, yes.

Game developers employing psychologists to design systems to suck out money out of kids are a real problem, regardless of the context. Similar to advertisement targeted at children, but squared.

[–] Zorque 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

This is blaming the tool for the actions of the person using them.

This is not a video game problem, this is a societal motivation problem. The motivation of corporations is to make money, so they employ whatever means they can to achieve that.

In this case it's targeting kids playing video games.

The tool is not the problem, the wielder is. Saying otherwise is extremely disingenuous.

[–] daddy32 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

"Wherever means necessary" should not be available to corporations. I guess we agree as much.

[–] Zorque 3 points 2 weeks ago

So you agree with my entire point, but don't want to admit as such?

That was literally my entire point. That corporations effectively have carte blanche to do what they want, then the tools they use are the ones to take the blame.

Video games are an escape, which can be a problem in and of itself even without exploitative tactics meant to squeeze them of profit... but again, that is a societal problem. The danger of escapism is not so great without something to escape from.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

I agree w the sentiment but not the exact statement; games themselves arent the problem, but theyre starting to become a part of it due to disgusting practices by folks like tencent n em.

Ironically one cool studio that doesnt indulge in such practices is fromsoftware. Just drops peak and keeps moving, even tho i believe theyre owned, at least partially or to some extent, by tencent as well? (scary)

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago

My little brother bought sone dorky bs in brawl stars for 10$ even tho were on hard times. I hope when he grows up he realizes how fkn stupid this was lol... (if he becomes a shooter game skin collector instead of a skyrim mod fanatic gigachad like me ima whoop his ass)

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago

Yup, this is why I don't let my kids play any games w/ MTX. They already get super obsessed every new thing they see, there's no way I'm dealing with that in their games as well.