For what it's worth, unless I see something especially egregious, I moderate this community based on reports. If no one seems to have an objection with what is posted here I leave it alone.
Just Post
Just post something π
While I agree that good-faith posts that don't necessarily fit could be left alone, where do you draw the line?
Usually a community has clear rules and if these rules are flexible, stuff gets a bit complicated when people get warnings, mutes, or bans.
Personally I think bans are a bit harsh and a mute / timeout for a while is often enough to deter bad faith posters. Repeated offenders would still get a ban, obviously.
LMAO, This post get removed on [email protected].
Reason:Β Rule 4: This is not a forum to complain about moderation actions/policies in other communities. Rules exist for a reason, and even though communities and user bases may be small, it is no reason to invite anarchy.
Yea, That was my entire point. We should bend rule sometime. I am not saying just go full blown Anarchy-No Rule. If someone is fucking Nazi we should ban them immediately.
Don't know if this is also right community to post or not.
Maybe [email protected], it fits the theme
Thanks, I am letting it here. If it get removed I don't care. Β―\_(γ)_/Β―