this post was submitted on 02 Nov 2024
52 points (98.1% liked)

World News

39153 readers
4144 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A World War II-era bridge that the Nazis built has been formally closed in the Serbian capital, Belgrade, ahead of its demolition. The closure came despite opponents' saying it would further limit transport options.

top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

But why though?

Blind serbian nationalism would be my guess but there seems to be more. Why now and why dismantle a working bridge without replacement?

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Built by nazi Germany during wartime 80 years ago? Can't imagine it's in very good shape now.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

That's what I thought too, but wouldn't it be mentioned somewhere in the article? Like a line saying:

"The city government plans to demolish the bridge due to risk of collapse."

[–] febra 8 points 3 weeks ago

Then maybe these journalists aren't doing their jobs properly. They should mention the reason behind it, be it nationalism or risk of collapse. They haven't mentioned either, which means they purposefully want to leave the reason up for debate. Bad journalism

[–] egrets 6 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

There's a ton of history on Wikipedia. Most of it is the council coming up with new reasons to demolish it or plans to change it, with no convincing motive.

The most notable things for me were:

  • An allegation that they want the bridge demolished to remove the trams that mar the modernity of the waterfront regeneration project nearby.
  • A mention of ~~Chinese lenders bankrolling the demolition and construction~~ a Chinese construction firm being awarded the contract for constructing a new bridge.
  • A mention of a Russian construction and design group submitting plans for transforming and relocating the existing bridge.
[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago

serbia chose the dark side. rest of ex yugo is cool. serbs are the nost shit ppl now it seems.