this post was submitted on 01 Nov 2024
76 points (93.2% liked)

World News

39154 readers
4176 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] kitnaht 50 points 3 weeks ago

Symbolic of just how fucking ridiculous they are.

[–] FlyingSquid 27 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

My $20 googol fine against Russia is more symbolic considering that's where Google got the name from.

[–] Tarquinn2049 19 points 3 weeks ago

Ah, I'm out of touch. When I saw the amount, I just assumed that was indicative of how far the ruble has fallen.

Thus, symbolic of how much they would need to charge to mean anything in USD.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I mean... it would have to be?

Is there even that much money in the global economy?

[–] [email protected] 16 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Not even close, by many orders of magnitude.

[–] benignintervention 9 points 3 weeks ago

By like 20 orders of magnitude or something

[–] Glitterbomb 5 points 3 weeks ago

Did rough math elsewhere, you would need around a million piles of cash each the size of planet earth to come close

[–] krazzyk 12 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I mean it's as ridiculous as 3 life sentences 🤷‍♂️😂

[–] [email protected] 10 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

That actually has a function. First is as a life sentence usually isn't actually until you die, but you sit x years (usually 20-30) and then can apply for parole and might get it. Multiple sentences can be set to run one after the other, increasing that time - though usually in that case you just get "life without parole".

Another is if you have committed multiple crimes. Even if later they overturn one of them because of new evidence etc, you still have the others left keeping you in prison, instead of having to bring it back to court to figure out if that part was or wasn't enough to give you a life sentence instead of a shorter one.

[–] krazzyk 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I'll admit I wasn't aware of the function they played, not from the states.

The sentences when someone gets a sentence for 100's, or 1000's of years, do they have the same function?

What's the longest term someone has been given for a single crime, I suspect it is still in the ridiculous range.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago

The sentences when someone gets a sentence for 100's, or 1000's of years, do they have the same function?

Basically the judge saying that no matter how much time credit your get for good behaviour while in prison you're still intended to spend the rest of your life there.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago

What a stupid move, why not just use a googleplex?

[–] jaggedrobotpubes 1 points 3 weeks ago

Twenty gigajillion.

[–] MediaBiasFactChecker -1 points 3 weeks ago

The Guardian - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for The Guardian:

Wiki: reliable - There is consensus that The Guardian is generally reliable. The Guardian's op-eds should be handled with WP:RSOPINION. Some editors believe The Guardian is biased or opinionated for politics. See also: The Guardian blogs.
Wiki: mixed - Most editors say that The Guardian blogs should be treated as newspaper blogs or opinion pieces due to reduced editorial oversight. Check the bottom of the article for a "blogposts" tag to determine whether the page is a blog post or a non-blog article. See also: The Guardian.


MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: Medium - Factual Reporting: Mixed - United Kingdom


Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.theguardian.com/world/2024/oct/31/russia-20-decillion-fine-against-google-symbolic-youtube-ban-pro-kremlin-media
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support