this post was submitted on 26 Oct 2024
157 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

1374 readers
214 users here now

Which posts fit here?

Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

[email protected]
[email protected]


Icon attribution | Banner attribution

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

AI bonuses, unfortunately, do not translate to job security for employees in other divisions.

top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jqubed 22 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

So, $15k per person terminated?

[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

15k to ruin someone’s livelihood? I’ll take 2000, please!

Man what a great system.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 weeks ago

We gotta give them a huge tax break too! That way it'll trickle down straight into the CEO's pocket!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago

So the company still gained, but with that money they could have cut 300 less employees and that would have been 300 people making 100k/year instead of one guy making 30.6m more...

[–] [email protected] 16 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

ummm... 👉👈 Tax the rich, maybe?

[–] Iheartcheese 12 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] Subtracty 5 points 3 weeks ago

He does look turtly enough for the turtle club.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 weeks ago

Providing nothing that isn't covered by other areas of the business, while profiting off the misery of others?

Guillotine.

[–] JASN_DE 6 points 3 weeks ago

despite

Yeah, that's not how capitalism works.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago
[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

When CEOs say they feel it when they need to do layoffs, I think they mean in their wallets.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

they probably don't feel anything when making any kind of purchase, it's more like raw unfiltered greed

[–] AnUnusualRelic 3 points 2 weeks ago

I don't think the board pays CEOs according to how many jobs they save. I don't know where you got that idea.

In fact I'm pretty sure that the more people they get rid of, the better paid they are.

[–] homesweethomeMrL 2 points 2 weeks ago

Fun Fact: Micro$oft is an evil-as-shit corporation and always has been.

[–] Professorozone 1 points 2 weeks ago

Well... he needs that money. Gosh!