this post was submitted on 13 Oct 2024
280 points (99.3% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5186 readers
1215 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Meanwhile in North America, Canada's VIA is operating on a shoestring and being further threatened ... and in the last 50 years the US has pulled up most of the rails that were installed in the previous century. We're stuck with airplanes, hybrid metro-transit, and what's left of Greyhound. But, hey, we've got a world to police!

top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 58 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

It's an effect that our conservatives from CDU and CSU as well as liberals from FDP are denying to exist and are decrying the fact that it costs money (and helps the average guy, but they can't say that out loud)

[–] cmhe 42 points 3 weeks ago

That is why we can't have nice things. Everything needs to make a profit and cannot simply be good.

Infrastructure shoudn't be required to make a profit. They are there for the public good. What's next? Paying for sitting on public benches and entering public parks? Paying for the privilege to exit your house and use the public sidewalk? We already have to pay to use public toilets in some cases...

These things should be available to everyone for free and build and financed via general taxes.

[–] [email protected] 46 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Meanwhile in North America, Canada's VIA is operating on a shoestring and being further threatened ...

Meanwhile in Germany the 49€ ticket is on the verge of dying and will be soon the 58€ ticket - all while the railroads are practically falling apart and the FDP, who is in charge of the transportation ministry, wants to feed 100 million to save an air taxi startup. lol

Maybe be a bit careful with what kind of "success" story you want to flaunt around.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

This article just reminded me to cancel my DB ticket, so they didn't get everything wrong I guess

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago

I couldn't even afford it, not even the so called "social ticket" for 39€ (Preisstufe A). lol

[–] [email protected] 37 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

And that is with shit rail infrastructure. Guess what would happen if we'd actually invest in rails?

Edit: Removed comma

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

This is totally unrelated but we don't use that comma after 'Guess' in English. I'm reminded of it because I'm learning German and it's been very difficult for me to remember to put commas after "I think" etc.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago
[–] BatrickPateman 2 points 3 weeks ago

Hell would freeze over, that's what would happen.

[–] NiPfi 28 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Too bad the announced price increase undoes about half of that

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Do you have a link to the increase? I did hear about it but everything I see online just says it's extended in to 2024.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Thanks. Shame it's increasing but 58EUR is still pretty good value, no?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Increasing the price by almost a fifth under a "center-left" government means this thing is just doomed once the right gets into power next year

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago

I see. Dang.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Pointing to this whenever the conservatives in Sweden say we need to raise prices and hire more ticket cops in order to increase ridership

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

How does that logic make any sense? You need less barriers for rides hip, not more.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

You're telling me.

The argument that they make is that more ticket sales -> more funding -> better service -> more riders

But honestly they spent so much on enforcement, it eroded the funding argument, and having to pay for €100 tickets every month, paying increased fines, and pass through slow ticket gates erodes the better service argument.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago

I guess that makes a little sense, but public transport should be an expense, not a business.

[–] synapse1278 2 points 3 weeks ago

It sucks the price is increasing. 58€/month is still cheaper than what my Jobticket (sponsored by my employer) use to cost, it was over 100€/month.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago

ITT: Germans complaining that everything is not perfect and incapable of appreciating all the good the Deutschland ticket has done.