this post was submitted on 06 Oct 2024
79 points (97.6% liked)

Thanks, I Hate It!

747 readers
1 users here now

Not a hate community, just a community with strong dislikes of particular things.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart 9 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I want to see two of them fucking.

[–] Zachariah 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Don’t act like you don’t know.

[–] Zachariah 8 points 2 months ago

I didn’t feel it was my place to say.

[–] GuyDudeman 4 points 2 months ago

I’ll bet you do.

[–] ohwhatfollyisman 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

if this travesty is to be entetained, then at least let the hands be hands and make the creature run on the hooves and human feet.

[–] Podunk 2 points 2 months ago

Oh my god you are right.

[–] edgemaster72 5 points 2 months ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

This reminds me, the other day I was thinking about putting the head of a human up a horse's ass in blender and 3d printing it to give to a friend with a sleipnir collection

[–] GuyDudeman 1 points 2 months ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Wouldn't reverse centaurs be bipedal?

[–] BluesF 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Well, I assume you'd still have the torso of a horse emerging from the body of a human... So, if you think about it, it makes most sense for the four legs to be on the ground (two human at the back, two horse at the front) while the arms in the middle are off the ground... I'm picturing excessive back arch to keep the arms high up enough to be useful.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Like slightly longer front human arms?

[–] BluesF 1 points 2 months ago

Regular length human arms, still on the middle two joints.. But now the front and back legs are on the ground. Like some sort of fucked up man horse centipede

[–] bamfic 2 points 2 months ago