this post was submitted on 05 Oct 2024
164 points (97.1% liked)

politics

19151 readers
3845 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TropicalDingdong 32 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Our Revolution better get the fuck on it then. Clocks about run out and shit is not looking great.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

I encourage you to take some of the election anxiety and turn it into productive action. That could look like canvasing (door knocking) to phone banking, text banking, letter writing and more. Those all have been shown to increase voter turnout. If nothing else, it at least reduce some of the anxiety

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

I appreciate your posts actually putting shit out there to give people clear actionable items. We should all be more like you.

[–] SemioticStandard 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)

the Uncommitted National Movement—which is critical of U.S. support for Israel's annihilation of Gaza—announced last month that "Harris' unwillingness to shift on unconditional weapons policy or to even make a clear campaign statement in support of upholding existing U.S. and international human rights law has made it impossible for us to endorse her." 

Uncommitted also made clear that it "opposes a Donald Trump presidency, whose agenda includes plans to accelerate the killing in Gazawhile intensifying the suppression of anti-war organizing," and "is not recommending a third-party vote in the presidential election, especially as third-party votes in key swing states could help inadvertently deliver a Trump presidency given our country's broken Electoral College system."

Okay, so what are these people recommending then? I’m trying to be generous, but they sound like fucking idiots.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago

They recommend that you do vote, and don't vote for anyone except Harris.

But they don't explicitly recommend you vote for Harris.

This is super serious voting strategy you guys.

[–] lmaydev 6 points 1 month ago

They aren't endorsing her. As in they don't fully support her. But voting for anyone else is worse as it helps trump.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

Okay, so what are these people recommending then? I’m trying to be generous, but they sound like fucking retards.

They're not recommending anything. I think that's the point.

[–] twistypencil 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Please don't use that word when talking about stupid people.

[–] SemioticStandard 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That’s fair, I’m sorry

[–] twistypencil 1 points 1 month ago

No worries, in French it means slow

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

Or so we hope.

[–] MediaBiasFactChecker -3 points 1 month ago

Common Dreams - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for Common Dreams:

MBFC: Left - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.commondreams.org/news/harris-2024
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support