this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2024
44 points (92.3% liked)

Television

4627 readers
4 users here now

Redirected - Please see [email protected]

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The third and now final part of "That '90s Show" debuted on the streamer in August

top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 23 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I watched a few episodes of season 1. I found all the kids to be completely generic and boring, I couldn't tell any of them apart. Whether that was due to the actors, the writing, or just me getting old I couldn't tell you.

[–] edgemaster72 6 points 2 months ago

I felt the same way initially, they do eventually get better developed towards the end of season 1 imo

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Season 1 wasn't terrible. Season 2 absolutely was.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago

Oh. Really? Bummer. I haven't seen season 2 yet. I was hoping it would be better than season 1. But after hearing about the cancellation, I am not surprised it was. I really wish the British Version of that 70s show would have been good. It's not good, but it is kind of comfortable

[–] VanillaBean 7 points 2 months ago

I didn't know this show even existed until around a month ago lol

[–] Nuke_the_whales 7 points 2 months ago

Wonder if the bad publicity around the original shows cast contributed to this. First season, everyone was talking about Danny Masterson. This season people just aren't down with Kutcher and Kunis. And this past month Kutcher's name has come up in relation to Diddy. None of them were in season 2 I believe. What's the point?

[–] DarkCloud 4 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Gonna need another two decades for a show set in the 90s to be novel, it can only be novel once today's clothing wouldn't fit in there.

The pitch of "it's like today, only the phones and computers are larger, and the Internet is smaller" just isn't meaningful enough of a difference.

[–] Brokkr 25 points 2 months ago (2 children)

There was 22 years between the first air date of that 70s show (98) and the year it was set in (76).

There was a 28 year difference for that 90s show. I never watched that 90s show, but I'm guessing the reason for its limited success has more to do with the quality and the nature of the current streaming environment than the setting.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod 14 points 2 months ago (2 children)

This makes me wonder how many shows we consider classics only got popular because the came on after something else we liked and we didn't change the channel. When given the choice to watch them we just... don't.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago

You've found the reason for the success of Full House.

[–] paraphrand 5 points 2 months ago

That along with the constrained amount of content. Yes.

[–] thessnake03 3 points 2 months ago

That 80's Show aired in 2002, and was set in 1984, 18 years earlier.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago

"Happy Days" initially aired about 15 years after the time in which it was set.