Drama in the Fediverse

1193 readers

1 users here now

Welcome to the Lemmy Drama community!

This is a place to share and enjoy drama across the fediverse. Grab your popcorn, and dive in!

Rules:

1. Don't bring your own drama.

If you are a part of the drama, don't post it here. We're here to enjoy drama, not see it brought to this community.

2. Be civil.

No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.

3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.

4. No ongoing drama.

if there’s been a comment in the past 3 days, wait until it’s settled down.

5. No interacting with the drama you find here.

That means no upvotes, no downvotes, and no commenting in the original thread.

6. Keep the drama focused on Lemmy and/or the fediverse only.

If it’s Kbin or Mastodon drama, it must be a quality effort post.

7. Don’t piss on the popcorn.

Inciting brigades is an automatic ban.

8. Mod Perogative

We reserve the right to enforce the rules however we like.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

JonsJava

breadsmasher

TrickDacy

-11

Is MTG a groomer? Should she be sent to jail? Is Hunter Biden complicit? The lemmings over at their r/politics clone discuss (lemmy.world)

submitted 1 year ago by gsa32 to c/lemmydrama

0 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Not the most dramatic thread, but I’m trying to get some drama posted here again. Regardless, [email protected] can get very dramatic

——-

Highlights:

Again. What the fuck does Hunter Biden matter, and why is this Scarecrow looking scab insist on wasting our money on this garbage?

Because he’s sneaking cocaine into the White house? [-74]

https://lemmy.world/comment/1585918

Now file charges under DC revenge porn law

https://lemmy.world/comment/1571973

Get her with the DC revenge porn law. It states very, very clearly, in the very first part of it, that what she didn’t did is illegal

Here:

(a) It shall be unlawful in the District of Columbia for a person to knowingly disclose one or more sexual images of another identified or identifiable person when: (1) The person depicted did not consent to the disclosure of the sexual image;

Except he very much did consent to disclosure by turning a drive and it’s content over to someone else [-97]

https://lemmy.world/comment/1574002

One side uses a distraction. It gets full media attention. People get involved. People get angry. People start blaming each other. Then, the other side counters with a distraction. It gets even more heated. This time it’s personal. There might even be consequences. Maybe…

Why the fuck are you eating all this rotting shit those out of touch, self-absorbed, greedy, attention-seeking Partisans are serving you? [-6]