This is insanity. Voting sites should be under the control of the federal government and run by nonpartisan commissions. States and especially not some county courthouse should have no control over whether or not a polling site exists. Polling sites should be based on population density regardless of voter turnout and Election Day should be a national holiday where everyone has the opportunity and ability to vote locally. All of this should be written into the constitution. This is pure voter suppression and anyone attempting this should be charged.
this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2024
363 points (99.5% liked)
News
23618 readers
3878 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
States legislators are the ones who choose electors to send to the Congress for the official vote. Technically, they can do whatever they want and ignore the votes of the people. You would need a constitutional amendment to chang be the way voting works and have the federal government control voting and elector selection requirements.
But hark! There is the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact (NPVIC). This initiative seeks to ensure that the U.S. president is elected based on the national popular vote rather than the Electoral College system. States that join the compact agree to allocate their electors to the candidate who wins the national popular vote, but it only takes effect once enough states join to total 270 electoral votes—the number needed to win the presidency.
It doesn’t require a constitutional amendment but works within the current system. However, for it to be implemented, enough states must sign on, representing a majority of the Electoral College votes.
"O’Hare has said it isn’t the county’s job to make it easier for specific groups to vote."
Yes👏 It👏 Fucking👏 Is👏
https://www.tarrantcountytx.gov/en/county-judge.html
“I am committed to fostering a culture within Tarrant County that not only celebrates faith, family and freedom, but champions these core values. My mission is to make Tarrant County the safest large county in Texas and to remain a place where the American Dream is alive and well.”
-Tim O'Hare
Voting sites really don't cost that much money. They probably spent more money putting up this measure than it would cost to just run the damn thing.
When I work elections, the county pays me roughly 180 bucks for the whole day 6am - 8pm (I dont do it for the money, obviously). The smallest one i worked had around 3-5 people, so less than 1k in labor overall.
All of the devices and materials aside from the ballots get re-used for each election, unless there are equipment changes. The voting locations themselves are often donated spaces, like churches and schools. There are also election technicians, but they're serving multiple precincts and dropping one location won't make much of a difference. Everyone else involved is usually already a salaried government worker.
All this to say, closing a precinct to "save money" is a pathetic excuse. Everyone has the right to vote. It should be the first thing we make sure we budget for.
My brother gors to UTSA and waited over 5 hours to vote on campus last year. It probably has nothing to do with UTSA's status as a Hispanic serving university.