this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2024
62 points (93.1% liked)

politics

18888 readers
4002 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer 14 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I always thought the biggest problem with these wasn't light penalties but that perpetrators were rarely caught because they plan things out and 10 seconds after you realize something's happening they're in the car driving off.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 days ago

Cops want an excuse to high speed chase 🤷‍♂️

Personally I would think increasing patrols in business areas to prevent property crime and decreasing them in residential areas focusing on drugs might be a good idea, but I'm just a random guy on the net, what do I know?

See a lot of grow houses busted, but rarely a stash of these kinds of organized retail gangs.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)

Were they actually happening significantly in California? Valid concern if they were, of course.

However, it seems otherwise the overarching narrative from retailers that this was happening all over the country seems false.

A whole host of retailers had to turn tail last year and be like "Okay, so maybe our losses weren't all shoplifting after all whoopsie doodles!"

It certainly wasn't a massive concern in my homestate, so how am I to know if it's actually a serious issue in California. I don't follow a lot of Cali-exclusive news.

So, any native Californians able to fill us other Lemmings in on whether this is needed or a farce? If it's needed, do you think it will actually deter these type of crimes, or do you think its just for show?

[–] just_another_person 7 points 6 days ago

They were becoming more popular in certain areas because it wasn't the same level of crime as say, breaking and entering into someone's home.

Some of these gangs were staking out carousels at airports watching for equipment cases to come through, then tailing cars they were loaded into to smash and grab the contents, sometimes with people in the vehicles stopped in traffic.

This sounds like they'll be prosecuted with a much harsher penalty now.

[–] CondensedPossum 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Gavin Newsom is a neocon freak. He's like Joe Manchin but with almost a whole coast to abuse.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 5 days ago

VBNMW, right?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 days ago (1 children)

It is comical that it even got to this point

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago

What point did it get to? How frequently does it happen, or is it just a media frenzy based on isolated incidents?

Media loves to stir up fear of crime, even as the crime rate declines. It'd be useful to see some facts.

[–] MediaBiasFactChecker -4 points 6 days ago

Associated Press - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for Associated Press:

MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://apnews.com/article/california-smash-grabs-retail-theft-30b3d0e0a85669fbfc6240667ce352fe
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support