Ok, so Dreamchess uses C++. I'm fine with that but I know best Unity and C# (and python too but that probably isn't useful for this.). There are some C# chess engine's which could be simpler because of C#. What do you think of that? I don't think we have to go that low level. Because there will be a lot of special moves and things like that I think we should go unity for the easier implementation of those. But if you have a lot of experience in C++ I'm ok with that too. Programming languages are pretty much the same after all.
AnarchyChessDevelopers
A cousin community to AnarchyChess for developers to have day to day discussions for working on any Open Source implementation of AnarchyChess.
Memes and typical AnarchyChess posts and comments may be removed if they become disruptive.
Sorry for the delay in getting back with a detailed response. I only have limited time to give the project. If i was building from the ground up, id consider just about anything, even making custom engines etc. But with only a few hours a week, hotwiring something else seems to be the best payoff to get something in the shortest time.
I know going deep with dreamchess would create some issues down the track, but if this just gets AnarchyChess 1.0 (The Knook arises), then i'm ok and if it inspires a full blown project, that'd be great, but i cant see me being a big developer of that.
Im fluent enough with C++ that it should be doable, i wont say easy, but i'm confident i can get something done as a build.
lichess seems to be the top chess system these days, and already supports chess variants. Why not just submit a patch with the ruleset you're looking for?
Very good question, Im not sure if they'll go ahead. But If i dont ask they wont just do it. I will ask. Edit: Email sent.
They've said they're not looking to add any more variants at this time.