this post was submitted on 21 Aug 2024
63 points (97.0% liked)

InsanePeopleFacebook

2695 readers
367 users here now

Screenshots of people being insane on Facebook. Please censor names/pics of end users in screenshots. Please follow the rules of lemmy.world

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

It would be way too much work to destroy a mountain-sized statue to the point that it is almost completely flat land where the statue used to be. I'm no expert, but my gut tells me this is probably true.

all 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 21 points 4 months ago (1 children)

lol @ the last guy with no clue or no value added. Just a 'gut feeling' that it's 3 million years old. and to him, this article just cemented that (idiotic) belief.

smh

[–] ThunderWhiskers 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, it's just that last guy who is off his rocker.

[–] FlyingSquid 7 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Just the last guy? Not the "Arkansas Sphinx" guy or the "what if a mercury-filled pyramid was in the Bermuda Triangle" guy?

[–] lemonmelon 5 points 4 months ago

Tbf the Arkansas Sphinx is real, but it's a natural rock formation that sort of resembles the Sphinx if you view it from the right angle and squint a bit. So I guess they get partial credit for that one.

[–] Blue_Morpho 13 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Considering that the pyramids used to be encased in white limestone that was all taken by everyone over the years for building homes, this one of the least crazy ideas I've seen.

[–] FlyingSquid 7 points 4 months ago

Then you have not seen a lot of crazy ideas. The pyramids are mostly still there, they haven't vanished. They are also made of easily-removable stones. The sphinx is one large carved solid rock. The claim is there was a second solid rock sphinx that was razed flat.

It's the difference between claiming the actual fact that a previous London Bridge was disassembled and then reassembled in Arizona is a corresponding fact to the completely false idea that there was a second Mount Rushmore that they had to flatten to the ground so people could get a view of the first Mount Rushmore.

One is plausible (and true in that case). The other is ludicrous. It's absolutely crazy.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I guess a second Sphinx is highly unlikely but not impossible, I would not know as I haven’t kept up with Archaeology. The rest of that screenshot is limestone bonkers.

[–] FlyingSquid 6 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Experts think it's nonsense and the guy who claims it is basically a PR guy for the Giza site.

https://www.ancient-origins.net/news-history-archaeology/second-sphinx-0016024

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago

Fair enough, the whole screenshot is limestone bonkers! Thanks!

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 months ago

Well that all escalated quickly

[–] esc27 6 points 4 months ago

Clearly the sphinxes are the remains of the ancient true cats that were turned to stone by space radiation after the real trees were cut down.

[–] ZagamTheVile 5 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I worked with a guy that would spend his entire paycheck on the lotto when it got big because he knew it was true that he'd win it. His gut told him it was true. It's been 10 years since I've seen him. Last time I did it was just after they announced the winning numbers for like $25Mil. He was standing on a corner begging for change so he could buy food.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

They're all wrong. The sphinx is actually 65m years old. It was a dinosaur with a person's face.

/s