this post was submitted on 20 Jul 2023
46 points (84.8% liked)

politics

19677 readers
5285 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] flossdaily 10 points 2 years ago (1 children)

That was an absolutely terrible and ignorant analysis.

What the author fails to understand is that while people like us (who enjoy reading political articles) have clear understandings of right and left-wing politics, the US is packed to the brim with voters who are completely untethered from this way of thinking.

Obama-Trump voters, for example, were voting based on ... What? Clearly no overarching policy agenda or partisan identity.

So how do we know 3rd parties ARE dangerous to Democrats?

Easy. We look at the victory margins from the most recent elections, and we calculate how many razor thin victories or losses would have gone the other way had a third party candidate taken votes from one side of the other.

When you do that, you can see that Democrats are in grave danger. Because people simply do not understand what is at stake. They do not understand what candidates actually stand for. They will vote based on the success or failure if misinformation campaigns.

So don't even think about relaxing. This stuff is incredibly dangerous.

We're very close to an election between a tired, old, do-little moderate president, or the head of a fascist right-wing cult.

What a shit show.

[–] what 0 points 2 years ago

All the Obama to Trump voters did that because they are sick of the political establishment. The danger to democrats isn't third parties but their inability to pass legislation the vast majority of Americans agree on.

[–] sramder 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Seems to have sprouted a mandatory login link :-(

[–] psychothumbs 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

No you can just click "continue reading" on that pop-up and read the rest without logging in

[–] sramder 2 points 2 years ago

Doh! Didn’t see that, thanks for pointing it out :-)

[–] hactar42 1 points 2 years ago

Now just convince them to disband the Commission on Presidential Debates

[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 years ago

That is an absolute lie. There are far too many "bOtHsIdEs!!1!!!1!!" idiots to remotely make it a good thing for Democracy, much less Democrats. All Third Partys shall do is improve odds of Fat Joffrey getting back in the White House.