this post was submitted on 07 Aug 2024
460 points (98.1% liked)

politics

19135 readers
2799 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The law, which was passed in Minnesota last year, includes language requiring menstrual products to be available in bathrooms of all schools for grades 4 to 12 as a way to accommodate transgender students.

As part of their effort to portray Tim Walz, the new Democratic vice-presidential candidate, as a far-left liberal, the Trump campaign attacked the Minnesota governor on Tuesday for signing a bill last year that provides access to menstrual products for transgender students.

At issue is broadly inclusive language in the law, which states that products like pads, tampons and other products used for menstruation “must be available to all menstruating students in restrooms regularly used by students in grades 4 to 12.” Republican state lawmakers in Minnesota had tried — and failed — to amend that bill so that it would apply only to “female restrooms,” though some Republicans went on to vote for the final version of bill.

(page 2) 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

“As a woman, I think there is no greater threat to our health than leaders who support gender-transition surgeries for young minors, who support putting tampons in men’s bathrooms in public schools,” Ms. Leavitt said. “Those are radical policies that Tim Walz supports. He actually signed a bill to do that.”

I'd say making women bleed to death on the hospital parking lot because doctors are forbidden from practicing abortions would be a greater threat to women's health, but what do I know.

[–] Lycist 6 points 3 months ago

Big Tampon must have something in trump to get them campaigning for personal purchasing instead of socialist-provided comforts.

Not-so-edited-edit:

spoiler(trump prolly has a tampon stuck up his ass)

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago

What a monster, treating women like humans.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I'm just a little confused, is this for assigned sex women who are male gendered so they still have their "lady bits" but feel more comfortable using male restrooms to match their gender? I guess it's obvious, assigned sex males can't have this issue regardless of surgery right?

I'm not 100% on the correct language so sorry if I wrote anything offensive.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I believe you're correct. You could just say it's for trans boys, because that implies both that they were assigned female and that they identify as male.

As for terminology, it's typical to refer to the gender which with someone identifies as simply their gender, and their originally presumed gender as their assigned gender. The terms AMAB and AFAB (for "assigned male/female at birth") are common, too.

One subtlety that's almost always overlooked is that assigned gender at birth can involve surgery, too, because it's unfortunately common for intersex people to be assigned female and have their genitals "fixed" to look female, leading to problems later in life. That's not relevant to the topic at hand but I wanted to mention it for the sake of completeness.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

Thanks for the info! :)

[–] MediaBiasFactChecker -5 points 3 months ago

New York Times - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for New York Times:

MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.nytimes.com/2024/08/06/us/politics/trump-tim-walz-tampons-schools.html
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›