this post was submitted on 25 Jul 2024
155 points (99.4% liked)

THE POLICE PROBLEM

2547 readers
112 users here now

    The police problem is that police are policed by the police. Cops are accountable only to other cops, which is no accountability at all.

    99.9999% of police brutality, corruption, and misconduct is never investigated, never punished, never makes the news, so it's not on this page.

    When cops are caught breaking the law, they're investigated by other cops. Details are kept quiet, the officers' names are withheld from public knowledge, and what info is eventually released is only what police choose to release — often nothing at all.

    When police are fired — which is all too rare — they leave with 'law enforcement experience' and can easily find work in another police department nearby. It's called "Wandering Cops."

    When police testify under oath, they lie so frequently that cops themselves have a joking term for it: "testilying." Yet it's almost unheard of for police to be punished or prosecuted for perjury.

    Cops can and do get away with lawlessness, because cops protect other cops. If they don't, they aren't cops for long.

    The legal doctrine of "qualified immunity" renders police officers invulnerable to lawsuits for almost anything they do. In practice, getting past 'qualified immunity' is so unlikely, it makes headlines when it happens.

    All this is a path to a police state.

    In a free society, police must always be under serious and skeptical public oversight, with non-cops and non-cronies in charge, issuing genuine punishment when warranted.

    Police who break the law must be prosecuted like anyone else, promptly fired if guilty, and barred from ever working in law-enforcement again.

    That's the solution.

♦ ♦ ♦

Our definition of ‘cops’ is broad, and includes prison guards, probation officers, shitty DAs and judges, etc — anyone who has the authority to fuck over people’s lives, with minimal or no oversight.

♦ ♦ ♦

RULES

Real-life decorum is expected. Please don't say things only a child or a jackass would say in person.

If you're here to support the police, you're trolling. Please exercise your right to remain silent.

Saying ~~cops~~ ANYONE should be killed lowers the IQ in any conversation. They're about killing people; we're not.

Please don't dox or post calls for harassment, vigilantism, tar & feather attacks, etc.

Please also abide by the instance rules.

It you've been banned but don't know why, check the moderator's log. If you feel you didn't deserve it, hey, I'm new at this and maybe you're right. Send a cordial PM, for a second chance.

♦ ♦ ♦

ALLIES

[email protected]

[email protected]

r/ACAB

r/BadCopNoDonut/

Randy Balko

The Civil Rights Lawyer

The Honest Courtesan

Identity Project

MirandaWarning.org

♦ ♦ ♦

INFO

A demonstrator's guide to understanding riot munitions

Adultification

Cops aren't supposed to be smart

Don't talk to the police.

Killings by law enforcement in Canada

Killings by law enforcement in the United Kingdom

Killings by law enforcement in the United States

Know your rights: Filming the police

Three words. 70 cases. The tragic history of 'I can’t breathe' (as of 2020)

Police aren't primarily about helping you or solving crimes.

Police lie under oath, a lot

Police spin: An object lesson in Copspeak

Police unions and arbitrators keep abusive cops on the street

Shielded from Justice: Police Brutality and Accountability in the United States

So you wanna be a cop?

When the police knock on your door

♦ ♦ ♦

ORGANIZATIONS

Black Lives Matter

Campaign Zero

Innocence Project

The Marshall Project

Movement Law Lab

NAACP

National Police Accountability Project

Say Their Names

Vera: Ending Mass Incarceration

 

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

tl;dr, we need more time examples and research to say anything authoritative, but anecdotally things look very positive. One excerpt,

There have been no known major injuries of any community responder on the job so far, according to experts. And data suggests unarmed responders rarely need to call in police. In Eugene, Oregon, which has operated the Crisis Assistance Helping Out On The Streets (known locally as CAHOOTS) response team since 1989, roughly 1% of their calls end up requiring police backup, according to the organization. Albuquerque responders have asked for police in 1% of calls, as of January. In Denver, the Support Team Assisted Response (STAR) team had never called for police backup due to a safety issue as of July 2022, the most recent data available. In Durham, members of the Holistic Empathetic Assistance Response Team (HEART) reported feeling safe on 99% of calls.

Many communities are still sending alternative responders to a narrow subset of calls, and debating whether it’s safe to expand their scope. For example, many cities will only send community responders to situations that are outdoors or in public spaces. Programs are also divided on whether disputes between neighbors or within families are a proper place for crisis responders, or calls involving suicidal threats.

Archived at https://web.archive.org/web/20240725114047/https://www.themarshallproject.org/2024/07/25/police-mental-health-alternative-911

top 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 19 points 4 months ago (1 children)

HEART is Durham NC's program and they have seen positive results. For some reason not sending uneducated dips shits with guns is dangerous.

[–] makeshiftreaper 7 points 4 months ago (1 children)

It's almost absurd how often America decides the answer to a problem is "asshole with a gun." Drug overdose? Asshole with a gun. Find out someone broke into your car? Asshole with a gun. Someone trying kill themselves? Asshole with a gun. Your grandma hasn't been heard from in a few days on the other side of the country? Believe it or not, asshole with a gun

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

How else will they protect themselves from falling acorns or boil pots of water? #copslivesarealwaysindanger

[–] jordanlund 18 points 4 months ago (2 children)

In Portland it's called "Portland Street Response" and so far, the #1 thing holding them back is they are prevented from being able to commit someone.

So, say I call 911 because someone is passed out on the sidewalk outside my house, that's the ideal thing for PSR.

They determine it's not an OD or other medical emergency, not much else they can do.

https://www.wweek.com/news/2023/06/21/portland-street-response-futilely-sought-authority-to-hold-distressed-people-against-their-will/

" In Multnomah County, 258 people may perform involuntary holds. Portland Street Response workers can’t.

That’s because county officials won’t let them.

For two years, PSR leaders have wanted that authority. The county still refuses—and it’s not entirely clear why."

[–] gAlienLifeform 17 points 4 months ago (1 children)

You think people should be involuntarily committed for sleeping on the sidewalk?

[–] jordanlund -5 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Passed out != sleeping, and yeah, anyone in a mental health crisis should be involuntarily committed.

[–] gAlienLifeform 13 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Passed out but not ODing or other medical emergency sounds like sleeping to me for all intents and purposes (like, passing out drunk isn't the same as actual sleep for the person's brain, but for society there's no real difference)

I'm of the opinion that unless someone is an imminent threat to themselves or someone else we can't be doing involuntary commitments, because a) involuntary commitments are almost always super traumatizing and set the person's journey to mental health backwards a few steps (maybe they get the resources they need from being committed and they leave the facility a few steps ahead, but most often they're just held and medicated for 72 hours and back out on to the street, and either way they're entering the facility worse than they had been if they're being forced into it), b) we just don't have enough beds at these facilities (let alone staff and other rehabilitative resources)

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago

No, not everyone in crisis needs to be involuntarily commited.

[–] jpreston2005 2 points 4 months ago

dang how about we just take them to a place they can sleep it off, if they're not in a medical emergency? have you ever been committed? it's kind of terrible? and not helpful?

[–] [email protected] 14 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Maybe because involuntary commitment does more harm than good? It was all the rage in the 19th century.

[–] jordanlund -3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

19th century people had all kinds of problems, but that's an excuse to learn from it and correct it, not get rid of it.

We need to fix what Reagan did to mental health care. That's where our current problems started.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

What we learned from that is that involuntary commitment doesn't work. And we corrected it by not doing it anymore.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

This guy thinks we've somehow evolved as a species from 50-100 years ago, so we should definitely go all in on it again. Government workers should totally be allowed to snatch people up off the streets or even in their own homes and send them to a facility where they're tied to a bed and pumped full of drugs based on little more than their own discretion. This would never be abused by some officer who thinks that anyone who doesn't kowtow to their ego is obviously crazy and needs to be put in a facility where they're considered crazy until they can somehow prove that they aren't to a bunch of strangers.

Come to think of it, these comments sound a little bit unhinged. Perhaps we need to call the authorities and have someone 5150ed...

[–] jpreston2005 5 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

A 2022 study on Denver’s STAR team found a 34% drop in low-level crime in neighborhoods where the team was operating, compared to neighborhoods where it had not yet been rolled out.

This program is the difference between helping people, and jailing them. Fantastic, send my tax dollars to these programs, please!

Macias from Atlanta noted that without increasing other social services, like housing and mental health care, the teams risk being merely a Band-Aid for people in crisis. “There’s a lot of pressure put on these response agencies without the local government building up the destination and infrastructure that people need,” she said. “Sure, expand these response teams 24/7, but make sure that at 11 p.m. on a Sunday there’s actually a place to bring somebody to get their needs met. Otherwise you’re just making yourself feel better. But the problem’s not being solved.”

A very salient point, these programs need funding! Let's divert half the police budget to them, maybe then that money will actually help our communities, instead of being used to terrorize them.

[–] recapitated 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The more that police specialize in (and glorify) violent combat scenarios, the less useful and valuable they are to the public. We need trained responders.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

I blame the backlash from 9/11. Before 2001, most cops saw themselves as police officers, Afterwards they all became anti-terrorism warriors.