this post was submitted on 20 Jul 2024

183 points (97.9% liked)

Ukraine

8204 readers

618 users here now

News and discussion related to Ukraine

*Sympathy for enemy combatants in any form is prohibited.

*No content depicting extreme violence or gore.

Donate to support Ukraine's Defense

Donate to support Humanitarian Aid

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

183

Poisoned fruit kills 12 Russian soldiers in southeast Ukraine (tvpworld.com)

submitted 3 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

22 comments fedilink hide all child comments

top 22 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] [email protected] 42 points 3 months ago

Hmm I'm not convinced it was the fruit. They should eat more and really find out if it was true

[–] [email protected] 40 points 3 months ago (1 children)

🍉🤭 🌻

[–] [email protected] 27 points 3 months ago

🍉🤭 🌻

🍉🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭🤭

⌛️🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🌻🌻🌻🌻🌻🌻🌻🌻🌻🌻🌻🌻

[–] MushuChupacabra 30 points 3 months ago

🌻 🌻 🌻 🌻 🌻 🌻 🌻 🌻 🌻 🌻 🌻 🌻

[–] cabron_offsets 21 points 3 months ago

Fuckem.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 3 months ago

Aww, they are upset their looting and pillaging has consequences. Boo hoo!

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 months ago (4 children)

Wait, this is allowed?

[–] Blum0108 37 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It's not a war crime of the people poisoning the fruit are not combatants. They could probably be tried for manslaughter, and I doubt Russia would be very lenient.

[+] ninja -22 points 3 months ago (5 children)

People don't get a 'get out of war crimes' card by not being officially in the military. If they purposefully took hostile action in the conflict they're combatants, uniformed or not. The use of poison is a war crime.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 3 months ago (1 children)

When the Russians use rape as a weapon, I cheer on the locals in occupied areas serving poisoned fruit

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

KYLR

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

~~Yes they do. This act falls under the purview of civilian enforcement. It is up to the controlling government to prosecute these civilian crimes in civilian criminal court.~~

EDIT: Okay, so this particular argument irked me so I investigated. Unfortunately, Ninja is technically correct. According to the ICRC civilians receive an instantaneous removal of their status as non-combatant for the duration of the hostile act, and the ICC's Rome Statutes clearly list using poison as a warcrime so it is probable the perpetrators could be prosecuted. More likely, however, is that their being subject to civilians laws means they can ALSO be prosecuted in the civilian manner. Double the risk for the reward.

That said. Russia wants to FAFO that's their problem.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

It's not a frequent event when a person on the internet recognizes their mistakes. I'm glad I saw it today.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 months ago

So if someone occupies your house, you'll serve cookies & cream?

[–] Wilzax 3 points 3 months ago

Not all war crimes are actually bad when committed against worse war criminals in self-defense.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 3 months ago

This appears to be done by civilians remaining in occupied territory

[–] woelkchen 6 points 3 months ago

Wait, this is allowed?

Not by Russian laws but who cares about those.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago

Nope, poisoning food and water is a war crime but who cares if only ruskies have ended dead.

[–] Thcdenton 5 points 3 months ago

The do a little bit of trolling

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 months ago

oof

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago

I believe they call that the watermelon crawl.