this post was submitted on 01 Jul 2024

116 points (92.0% liked)

Cool Guides

4071 readers

909 users here now

Rules for Posting Guides on Our Community

1. Defining a Guide Guides are comprehensive reference materials, how-tos, or comparison tables. A guide must be well-organized both in content and layout. Information should be easily accessible without unnecessary navigation. Guides can include flowcharts, step-by-step instructions, or visual references that compare different elements side by side.

2. Infographic Guidelines Infographics are permitted if they are educational and informative. They should aim to convey complex information visually and clearly. However, infographics that primarily serve as visual essays without structured guidance will be subject to removal.

3. Grey Area Moderators may use discretion when deciding to remove posts. If in doubt, message us or use downvotes for content you find inappropriate.

4. Source Attribution If you know the original source of a guide, share it in the comments to credit the creators.

5. Diverse Content To keep our community engaging, avoid saturating the feed with similar topics. Excessive posts on a single topic may be moderated to maintain diversity.

6. Verify in Comments Always check the comments for additional insights or corrections. Moderators rely on community expertise for accuracy.

Community Guidelines

Direct Image Links Only Only direct links to .png, .jpg, and .jpeg image formats are permitted.
Educational Infographics Only Infographics must aim to educate and inform with structured content. Purely narrative or non-informative infographics may be removed.
Serious Guides Only Nonserious or comedy-based guides will be removed.
No Harmful Content Guides promoting dangerous or harmful activities/materials will be removed. This includes content intended to cause harm to others.

By following these rules, we can maintain a diverse and informative community. If you have any questions or concerns, feel free to reach out to the moderators. Thank you for contributing responsibly!

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

116

A cool guide about Latin Phrases you should know (i.redd.it)

submitted 2 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

17 comments fedilink hide all child comments

top 17 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] [email protected] 28 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Seems to miss some big ones and providing understanding of them.

“Et cetera”

“and other things”
abbreviated to “etc”
not pronounced “excetera” … but honestly I wouldn’t worry about it because this is the sort of alteration the Romans would have made and did make, and language is always evolving.
IMO, basically a distinct English word now

“Exempli gratia”

“for the sake of an example” / “for example”
abbreviated “eg”
basically a distinct English word now in the abbreviated form, pronounced “ee gee”.
easily substituted with a plain English translation “for example”

“Id est”

“that is”
abbreviated “ie”
like the above, basically a distinct English word now, IMO.
easily substituted with its plain English equivalent: “that is”
- especially given how close the Latin is to the English …. Notice how similar the two phrases sound … that’s not a coincidence, these languages are related after all.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 days ago (2 children)

“Exempli gratia”

abbreviated “eg”

I never thought e.g. could have latin roots, I thought "e.g." was just "example given" abbreviated.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

That's totally fair! "Exempli gratia" is fairly esoteric. Even as far as latin goes, it's not the most straightforward to translate.

My general point is though, that "eg" can easily stand for "example given" ... it's such a mainstay of english now, without "exempli gratia" being commonly known at all.

[–] Hellstormy 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I always thought that i.e. was "in example"

[–] Feathercrown 5 points 1 day ago

"i.e." is for clarification, "e.g." is for examples. They get mixed up all the time, because most people don't know what they stand for.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Yeah this is a somewhat bad guide at least as far as some of these entries

I would also add:

ad hoc = sort of made up for this one situation; "ad hoc attendance system" means they're not following the structure; carries an implication that it's more or less working but maybe not the best way
de facto = it doesn't have the designation but regardless of that, the meaning of the designation is what's happening; "de facto manager" means they don't have the manager title but that's the job they are doing
per se = I'm being nitpicky about details so please be careful not to read anything into my statements other than what's specifically said; "he didn't drive off the road per se, but he skidded on the turn and he was way out of his lane"

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago

Yea, the point of any thing like this would be to provide a better grip on what's going on with these phrases and to break down the opacity of their coming from another language.

The thing with latin though is that it isn't quite an alien language to english speakers ... so many components of it have ended up in language that an english speaker can kind of "triangulate" some of it.

The "ad" in "ad hoc", for instance. It's the same "ad" in "advance" or "addition" "admit". And "hoc" is related to English "here". It literally means "toward this (thing)", which takes on the meaning "for the purpose of this thing" ... that is, being "for a specific thing", not "general purpose".

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

If you want to use old latin expressions, and also make people uncomfortable, you can pronounce it the way the romans did. Always pronounce "c" as "k", and "v" as our "w", to begin with. "Veni. Vidi. Vici." becomes "Weni. Widi. Wiki.", et ketera.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

pronounce [...] “v” as our “w”, to begin with. “Veni. Vidi. Vici.” becomes “Weni. Widi. Wiki.

Ok, maybe I am stupid, regarding the v/w sound, but would you normaly pronounce the V in "Veni. Vidi. Vici." like the v-sound in "give" or "have"?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

In church latin yes. For example we say "vice versa", not "wike wersa" ("wike" being two syllables btw). If it helps think of the w as our u. "ui-ke uer-sa".

[–] shneancy 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

oh yeah right, wasn't v the precursor to u?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

One could say that "u" is a lazily written "V". This was before we had the concept of upper and lower case letters. The roman alphabet used for fancy writing is pretty much exactly as our upper case letters. This was written with a flat brush, but they also had a more cursive everyday alphabet which is quite hard for us to read. Eventually writing with pens made the alphabet evolve into uncial letters that look kind of Tolkienesque. To mark the beginning of a verse they used the old roman fancy letter to have something that stood out in the text, i.e. a versal. "V" is a versal, and "u" was the running text version, but it was considered the same letter. For example they would write "Vniuersum" where we write "Universum" now. Then some complicated things happened in history that necessitated different sounds and the pronounciation split into v, u, and w, over time.

[–] shneancy 4 points 1 day ago

oh dang that's so cool! thank you for sharing

[–] Hawke 14 points 2 days ago

I think it misses some point of how the phrases are used, their actual meaning. E.g. “per se” meaning “through itself” might be a literal translation but it doesn’t explain how to understand them or use them.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

always end your conversations with "ceterum censeo carthaginem esse delendam"

[–] grue 6 points 1 day ago

Calm down, Cato

[–] ManosTheHandsOfFate 7 points 2 days ago

Not sure it rises to the level of "cool."