this post was submitted on 18 Jul 2023
103 points (100.0% liked)

Games

32586 readers
2104 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Wooly 16 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Or the unsettling alternative: "are you 18?" "Yes" "Prove it"

[–] Wooly 5 points 1 year ago

Didn't the UK govt already try that with a gaming ID that went nowhere?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

US states are already testing that option with disastrous results.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh, is this just for kids? That's the worst option since it means checking and privacy invasion.

I'd rather they just flat out ban them. Loot boxes never make anything better.

[–] Wooly 3 points 1 year ago

Pretty much, I didn't see much in the way of actual solutions in the article.

[–] helloharu 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The first is a commitment to make available technological controls to effectively restrict anyone under 18 from acquiring a loot box without the consent or knowledge of a parent or guardian. Many of these controls are already available on games platforms but aren't as widely used as they could be. The new principles set out best-practice for their use in an effort to increase take-up.

The second is to drive awareness of those controls with a public information campaign. An expert panel will be set up to share best practices on age assurance issues.

This is pretty pathetic and limp. They need to take a stronger stance on this than just get parent/guardian agreement - we already know how this will go and that circumvention is just going to be lying about age.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

I saw a pathetic statement from that woman in the news the other day - "we can trust the games industry to regulate itself blah blah"... Can we fuck. Typical free market Tory politician.

[–] Aux 1 points 1 year ago

Great news!