this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2024
21 points (74.4% liked)

thebirdspapaya_snark

177 readers
116 users here now

Hello new Lemmy friends!

Word on the street tells us our community is regularly making it the all page. While this is very cool news to hear, we can see how the sudden emergence of our posts in your feed might feel jarring and probably raises some questions. And also how, without knowing the backstory, our community might appear less than virtuous, so here’s a very brief introduction which hopefully will clear a few things up.

The woman we’re discussing is a body positive influencer and media personality who has gained fame and wealth by lying, manipulating, exploiting her children for content, plagiarizing BIPOC creators and blaming her BIPOC content editor for it (thereby ruining her career), among other things. Her fraudulent behavior is no different (I’d argue worse) from the likes of Jay Shetty (google him if you don’t know who he is or what he did). She’s the latest in a long line of grifting influencers who are abusing their power, taking advantage of their position and exploiting their followers. The difference is that she’s Canadian. Our laws around social media and advertising aren’t as clear (and where they are she’s disobeyed them), add to that, our mainstream media has protected her from those who’ve tried to expose her grift and silenced/intimidated anyone who’s tried to speak out.

Our Reddit sub was taken down due to reports of copyright infringement, which is unfounded and categorically untrue as no one ever tried to steal her work and pass it off as their own. The mods have made an appeal. While at first glance it may seem like we’re just “shitting on her” the sub has been more devoted to investigation and posting proof of her lies than just bitching for the sake of bitching. The reality is that she’s hurt, manipulated and let down a lot of people. She stole intellectual property and employment, caused mental distress and has repeatedly told lies to boost engagement and profit off her audience, so people are understandably upset that their voices are being silenced.

We’re grateful to have been welcomed so kindly by so many of you, and to those sticking around to watch the drama unfold, we’re glad to have you!

**all posts are alleged.

Rules:

-Please follow Lemmy content guidelines. See https://lemmy.ca/

-Minor's Right to Privacy: No posts about the children whatsoever. No mention of full names and no photos. Minors must be completely removed from all photos/videos. No exceptions. This goes for ANY child. No just TBP's.

-No snarking on the character or appearance of any of the children. This is a site dedicated to Sarah Landry.

-No posting information that is not readily available online/NoDoxxing: Influencers post an abundance of personal information online. Examples of doxxing include:

-Comments Regarding Mental Health: Jokes or Snide remarks about mental health or unaliving oneself will not be tolerated under any circumstances. No armchair diagnosing.

-Do not post or solicit communication with TBP or related influencers: This includes screenshots and references to 'this is what I commented.' Please message a mod if you would like to share anything anonymously.

-No racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, body shaming or other ism/bigotry.

-No TBP crusaders

-No commenting with the sole purpose of being rude/insulting: while criticism/debate is welcome on the page, being purposefully mean, insulting and rude is not.

-No brigading/incitement of mass harassment. Do not post links to affiliate sites, or incite members of the sub to brigade against TBP/related parties (this includes brands).

-Fact check and do your homework: Make sure to research before posting. If you are posting photos or videos that are filtered/photoshopped, make sure it is blatantly obvious. No rumours. no speculations (example Ozempic use).

-No overly vulgar language.

-No advertisement of any kind

-No duplicate posts

founded 3 weeks ago
MODERATORS
 

One of the most hideous shoes I’ve ever seen. That profile… Looks like a kitten heel getting strangled by a python. So so so awful. Is she trolling us? Lol

top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The Birds Papaya has no taste. For all her millions you think she'd purchase quality. Nope. Puffy kitten heels off Amazon. Hideous!

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago

All her taste is in her mouth!

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Imagine being a ✨️world✨️famous✨️swimsuit✨️model✨️ but you still buy all your clothes from Amazon. Tragic.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago

UGLY shoes. If they were cute from Amazon that would be a diff story

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The perfect match to her elongated-codpiece prom frock. Thank goodness.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago

codpiece prom frock 😂

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

Lololol elongated codpiece!!!

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 week ago

Are people really running to buy the hideous stuff she wears and then posts affiliate links for? Like who wants these ugly ass shoes.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 week ago

Is she allergic to serving cuz what is this outfit

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I hate that she supports one of the worst corporations when she could EASILY afford something just as cute and more sustainable.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Her and the neighbour still drink Coke daily and post about it, Briony does McDonalds stuff, Alicia did Starbucks giveaways, they all order nonstop from Amazon, I could go on. Muslim and non-Muslim followers have been asking people to boycott these companies for 9 months now. It’s not news. It’s not hard to do. Or at least don’t share drinking Coke, ordering from Amazon, and all the rest! They don’t care. I blocked them and their friends all months ago (S about a year or so ago) but on instanavigation I see that they all still simply don’t care about their complicity or their influence on others. I would like the puffy shoe but only in a flat, but maybe in like violet or cyan? The concept could be cool.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

Agreed, if someone like me who doesn’t have a fraction of the disposable income can make more ethical choices, they can too. There’s literally zero reason for any of them to buy fast fashion; why can’t they support sustainable Canadian businesses that employ women (and no, not for free or #gifted)? It’s ridiculous. And yes, the shoes would be much more cute in a flat/different colour! The kitten heel kills me 😅.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] johannesvanderwhales 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That really is about the least flattering dress I've ever seen.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 week ago

She's nothing if not consistent. Every dress she chooses is so very strange. And the shoes. Always the weirdest. And not in a cute, quirky way, either.

[–] shyguyblue 11 points 1 week ago

And those shoes, ugh just awful. ~ Johnny

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

How does anyone stand following her with all these constant affiliate links?