this post was submitted on 03 Jun 2024
186 points (97.4% liked)

interestingasfuck

707 readers
303 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ArcaneGadget 42 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

There is some bullshit going on with the "rediscovery" -part... It's like, smack on the mountainside. You can plainly see it from the nearby town. And there are houses within a couple hundred meters of the site in the other direction...

[–] PhoreTwunny 36 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

From a reddit post I found:

The complex was lost and forgotten for centuries; then found by accident by a local pilot in 2000.

On a clear February morning in 2000, Nicolino Lombardi, a local historian and pilot, flew his ultralight over nearby Mt. San Nicola. He planned to photograph a recent landslide on the hills south of his village of Pietravairano in the Campania region of Italy. Lombardi had photographed this region in the past and was accustomed to seeing fragments of ancient Samnite, Roman, and medieval ruins mostly obscured by blankets of foliage. However, during this particular flight, the view was different. A recent brushfire had cleared the overgrowth and revealed a long-hidden treasure: the ruins of a theatre/temple complex. In his report following his discovery, Lombardi wrote, “This time, however, the symmetry immediately catches the eye, and everything is clear in a flash: I even seem to see a temple and a theater, with the colonnade still standing and the wide steps full of spectators” (Lombardi p.1).

His photo from 2000

More info (in Italian)

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 weeks ago

Thanks for this - it becomes very clear how something like this could be undiscovered, even with others nearby.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago

Thank you for this!

[–] [email protected] 32 points 3 weeks ago

Excavations began in 2002

[–] danekrae 12 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

I don't get it. Was the houses in the background built after it was rediscovered, or were people just blind?

Was it burried? How? Its on the top of a hill.

Here is another angle with even more buildings and fields with a clear line of sight.

[–] [email protected] 46 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

I'm imagining it looked something like the Teotihuacan pyramid before it was excavated: looks like a mountain.

Teotihuacan pyramid before and after excavation

Edit: Uploaded higher-res photo.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

that is one hella suspicious mountain

[–] AngryCommieKender 4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Nah, they are all over. There's enough of them that the ancient aliens people always end up talking about them. Famous one in Eastern Europe. The difference is that those have strata layers, not blocks of stone

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

do you mean buried pyramids or mountains that look like they contain pyramids but are just mountains?

[–] AngryCommieKender 3 points 3 weeks ago

Mountains that look like pyramids are pretty common. Normally they aren't quite that straight, but it does happen. AFAIK we scan them these days to see if anything is there before bothering to dig

[–] LesserAbe 18 points 3 weeks ago

This site, "the ancient theater archive" says the hangglider guy was used to seeing glimpses of ruins covered by foliage, but there had been a recent brush fire that made it more obvious.