this post was submitted on 29 May 2024
170 points (100.0% liked)

Science Memes

73 readers
1 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] _different_username 44 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Works that cannot be recovered by readers are cited in the text as personal communications. Personal communications include emails, text messages, online chats or direct messages, personal interviews, telephone conversations, live speeches, nonarchived social media livestreams (e.g., Instagram Live, Twitter Spaces), unrecorded webinars, unrecorded classroom lectures, memos, letters, messages from nonarchived discussion groups or online bulletin boards, and so on.

[–] barsquid 17 points 7 months ago (1 children)

This is so cool but I guess there needs to be an entity to attribute it to? Like (Biblically Accurate Angel, personal communication, May 29, 2024).

[–] _different_username 6 points 7 months ago

Divine inspiration was a perfectly acceptable source of knowledge to the ancients.

[–] axemurber 20 points 7 months ago

Officially, create an appendix, describe your research and method in there, clarify that it is a dream, then refer to set appendix like this: "in my mind scale(appendix 1)".

[–] NeptuneOrbit 18 points 7 months ago

Parallel construction. Go find someone else who discovered the same thing and cite that. Easy peasy.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 7 months ago

I think you need to use MLA format for that.

[–] gibmiser 6 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Copilot In APA 7 format, personal experiences like a vision you had are considered personal communications. Since personal communications are not recoverable data, they are not included in the reference list but can be cited in the text. To cite your vision, you would include your initials and surname, along with the phrase “personal communication,” and the date of the experience. Here’s an example of how you might cite it:

Narrative citation: J. Doe (personal communication, May 29, 2024)

[–] Hildegarde 13 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

As an AI, copilot is very experienced with hallucinations, so its probably right on this.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Prove it with a study, then cite that study.

[–] Everythingispenguins 7 points 7 months ago (1 children)

To much work, how about just saying you did the study in your dream?

[–] wreckedcarzz 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

This guy/gal/sentient being right here, they are doing things that mere mortals cannot fathom. You shall go far, young one.

[–] Everythingispenguins 1 points 7 months ago

Sadly not young. Them be years and years of short cuts.

[–] adam_y 4 points 7 months ago

Sounds like a phenomenological situation ... Or as we like to call it in the sciences, "not science".