this post was submitted on 29 May 2024
80 points (90.8% liked)

Selfhosted

40728 readers
482 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
ruud
Loki
CannaVet
devve
HybridSarcasm
[email protected]
80
Llama-FS Self-Organizing File Manager (github.com)
submitted 6 months ago by d_ohlin to c/selfhosted
12 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Hadn't seen this here yet, a co-worker of mine sent it my way so I'm just spreading the word. Looks interesting, to say the least! Anyone tried this out or had any other experience with it yet?

all 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 54 points 6 months ago

Seems a neat way to lose everything

[–] [email protected] 30 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I can sort of see the appeal, but its not for me. If anything is ever going to rename files for me its going to be a script that I've either written or at least read top to bottom. Not a blackbox inference engine, and especially not one based on an LLM.

[–] d_ohlin 11 points 6 months ago

I definitely would lean into your camp for sure. The demo video shows it previewing suggested renames before accepting, but I see your point and I definitely had the same initial reaction lol

[–] [email protected] 22 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Why rename the files when you could just categorise and index them..?

This seems unnecessarily destructive.

[–] romp_2_door 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I've been long looking for this rename feature.

I have so many files that are titled

Document-2022(1).pdf

or

contract(1).pdf

Really wish that they had descriptive titles so I can know what's in them without having to open them

[–] [email protected] 12 points 6 months ago

It would be better to have this as a FUSE filesystem though - you mount it on an empty directory, point the tool at your unorganised data and let it run its indexing and LLM categorisation/labelling, and your files are resurfaced under the mountpoint without any potentially damaging changes to the original data.

The other option would be just generating a bunch of symlinks, but I personally feel a FUSE implementation would be cleaner.

It's pretty clear that actually renaming the original files based on the output of an LLM is a bad idea though.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 6 months ago (1 children)

That’s a neat application of LLMs. I echo the other comments here in that I’d want final say on file changes and the ability to only enable it for certain directories.

[–] d_ohlin 2 points 6 months ago

I totally agree - demo video I saw makes it look like it totally has both those features

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago

I like the idea, but I really hate that they've hardcoded the provider.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Ngl that's a interesting idea. Would definitely want it running locally, though.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Looks like it allows that using ollama

Edit: according a couple issues, the flag that allows this is being ignored...

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago

Haha well that's uhh....