this post was submitted on 27 May 2024
287 points (88.7% liked)

Science Memes

10853 readers
3578 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] hperrin 165 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

There is only one species of dog, canis familiaris. I still wouldn’t call a chihuahua and a great dane the same thing. Species or subspecies, indica is still a different thing.

[–] Dasus 59 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Huh, last I looked somewhere I'm pretty sure indica was considered a subspecies, not a distinct species. Thanks for the update or correction, either or.

Oh wait no I should've known, it's something we're still pretty much arguing over. That is whether sativa and indica (and ruderalis) are both suspecies, or whether they're all their own species in the same family.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4604179/#:~:text=Cannabis%20is%20often%20divided%20into,often%20has%20a%20few%20branches.

And dog breeds are still (at least in the vast majority) not even different subspecies, just different breed (variants of the same species)

Indica is technically "cannabis sativa indica" and then a strain would technically be written fully as "C. sativa var indica, 'Indian Kush'" or "C. sativa indica, var 'Northern Lights'" or something to that effect. But also sativa would be like "C. sativa sativa, var. 'Durban Poison'"

This is all up for debate, I'm not saying there's consensus on what is or isn't correct. Just inputting a lil content to Lemmy

[–] [email protected] 11 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Cannabis Ruderalis has entered the chat as the third currently recognized species, unique for its auto-flowering quality.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Can you smoke it? Or is it like the Intel Arc of weed?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Hule 6 points 5 months ago (3 children)

I understand self-pollinating, but what is auto-flowering?

[–] [email protected] 14 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Short answer non-autoflowering cannabis relies on the day/night cycle to figure out when to flower, while auto-flowering relies on an inbuilt timer, once it's old enough it'll flower.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 months ago

Where self-pollinating is where a plant’s pollen fertilizes its own ovules to create seeds, auto-flowering is where the plant transitions from vegetative state to the flowering state based on age instead of light cycle.

Idk it’s so interesting to me

[–] Dasus 8 points 5 months ago (1 children)

"Normal" (non-autoflowering) cannabis is more properly "photoperiod", which means that they only start blooming once they "recognise" the light period to be around 12/12 (and some strains like 18/6, referred to as "earlys", but those are quite rare.)

"Autoflowering" refers to how the plants "automatically" go into bloom despite the light period you have. Ruderalis is (well arguably) a subspecies (or a species of it's own, whatever) that evolved at such northern latitudes that when the lights actually hit 12/12 (in autumn), there wouldn't be time to bloom.

So ruderalis evolved to bloom despite the light period, more relying on just how old/big/fed the plant is. Mainly just the age of the plant.

At first ruderalis strains were really small and mild (Lowryder, ah, the nostalgia), but that was like 15 years ago.

Nowadays it's hard to find strains that there aren't autoflowering versions for, and the plants can be pretty much just as huge as "normal" photoperiods.

Depends on the grower and whether they're grow outside or inside, but not having to change your lights can be an advantage, especially since the 12/12 requires 12 hours of proper darkness, ao for instance small windowsill cannabis wouldn't bloom in northern latitudes. Requires a good lightproof tent to grow normal photoperiods. Autoflowers are less fussy and usually faster from seed to weed.

However if you do have a proper setup, you're probably gonna want photoperiods, as growing them gives more control. You can decide how long you want the "vegetative" phase to last, so you can grow the plants for 3 weeks them force them to bloom or you can grow them for 6 weeks and let them flower. Then the flowering takes about 8-12 weeks on top of that. With autoflowers it's usually 10-12 from seed to harvest. Fastest ones claim 8 weeks.

Hope that answers your question somewhat.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Zehzin 58 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

I mean, I don't partake but isn't it the same as saying cabbage, kale, broccoli, cauliflower and a dozen other things are the same?

[–] RadicalEagle 24 points 5 months ago

It would be the same as saying there is only one species of broccoli, Brassica oleracea.

[–] [email protected] 39 points 5 months ago (3 children)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 5 months ago

"What's with all the files named after cannabis strains on the gcms and lcms computers?"
"I was making a point."

[–] Yokozuna 6 points 5 months ago

Right there with you. I got a good giggle out of this.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 24 points 5 months ago (1 children)

me when weed smokers are talking about magic mushroom “strains”.

[–] Dasus 8 points 5 months ago (10 children)

These are pretty different though, as cannabis has literally dozens of different cannabinoids and terpenes, but "magic mushrooms" refers to psilocybin shrooms, which all have psilocybin and psilocin in varying amounts.

Cannabis relies on the entourage effect.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (3 children)

MFW someone pretends there is a universally accepted definition of "species."

[–] RadicalEagle 11 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Obviously life will refuse to be neatly classified, but that doesn't mean people smarter than us won't still try to do it in order to better understand the world.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Species

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

... yes? Did you not read your own link? There are several definitions of "species" offered. Go have a look at how this applies to Cannabis and perhaps you will get my point.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 5 months ago

is this a ligma joke that i'm too high to understand

[–] [email protected] 12 points 5 months ago (2 children)

this is actually one thing that has pissed me off for 30+ years. to be fair, there is 2-3 types, one for smoking, one for hemp products (non smoking/not getting high) and the wild kind.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 months ago

Kinda sorta a bit different but you got the gist down close enough. 🙏

Cannabaceae is the plants family which is good shit btw 🤩🧐

There are two ways of thinking I’m aware of. It’s all cannabis sativa. Or. It’s cannabis sativa, Cannabis indica and cannabis ruderalis as the three sub species.

Ruderalis is literally ditch weed in that it grows randomlyin the ditch’s around midwestern America, near where “hemp” was produced previously, and produces nothing smokeable or enjoyable I’m aware of.

Hemp is just a governmental term applied to the cannabis plant to denote it has less than .3% THC making it non psychoactive. This is currently heavily abused in the USA as THCa, the naturally occurring acid that grows on cannabis, melts or converts into THC with heat. And the law seemingly defines it into as THC being over .3% not THCa. Weird loophole.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 5 months ago (1 children)

The hops used for brewing beer belong to the same family as marijuana and have a similar alkaloid, the hop harvesters at the end of the day can confirm this.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Hackberry trees (Celtis occidentalis) are also in the same family!

[–] littlebluespark 5 points 5 months ago

Sounds like a 90s diesel strain that'll have you coughing your balls off.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 5 months ago (6 children)
[–] rockSlayer 22 points 5 months ago (16 children)

Cannabis sativa is the same plant for every single strain of cannabis in existence, as well as hemp. The meme is pointing out how we talk about sativa, indica, and hybrids as completely different plants, rather than variations of the same species

[–] [email protected] 12 points 5 months ago (2 children)

But each strain is different, right? Like how a chihuahua and a German shepherd are both dogs, but vastly different.

[–] rockSlayer 19 points 5 months ago

Yes, the different strains absolutely have some differences, and I'm not trying to say it's all bullshit. Weed is awesome, and we should document new stuff as it comes along, but we need to remember that it's all a single plant. I'd say weed is like the apple of drugs

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago

Is this ...bioessentialism?

load more comments
view more: next ›