this post was submitted on 15 May 2024
64 points (93.2% liked)

science

14443 readers
182 users here now

just science related topics. please contribute

note: clickbait sources/headlines aren't liked generally. I've posted crap sources and later deleted or edit to improve after complaints. whoops, sry

Rule 1) Be kind.

lemmy.world rules: https://mastodon.world/about

I don't screen everything, lrn2scroll

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 19 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The presence of big tech anywhere near something like this is freaking me out, tbh

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 months ago

You‘re so right. Google hasnt got anything to do near this. We all know what they’re gonna use this for, right? They’re gonna find pathways that make looking away from ads impossible or hardwire the ads into our brains.

KEEP THEM FROM PURSUING THIS!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

We don't need Google anywhere near brain research.

[–] whostosay 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I don't think you know how needed they really are. They have the talent, the hardware, and money. That said, we need to regulate because they also have one thing working against all else, greed.

[–] Plopp 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

How much would they spend on this if they're not allowed to apply their greed to the end result? They want ROI.

[–] whostosay 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

People that have that type of skill set don't get it by only chasing money, in guess some might, but genuine interest is more likely imo

[–] Plopp 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The individuals, yes, but I'm talking about the corporation.

[–] whostosay 1 points 4 months ago

For sure, but it's just one of those things where you're not going to get one without the other in our current system unfortunately.

[–] venusaur 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The entire world would have to work together to map the brain at this rate.

[–] davidgro 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

We kinda did that for the genome

[–] BrerChicken 3 points 4 months ago (3 children)

This is so much more complex than the HGP

[–] davidgro 3 points 4 months ago

Very true. Even though we have more advanced data tools and everything, it would still be orders of magnitude more difficult

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

Which was so much more complex than mapping the GI track, but people were robbing graves for centuries trying to work that one out.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] fubbernuckin 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The genome is so much more complicated than... itself?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

No, genetic. There's epigenetics and looks like the histone has an influence too. HGP was only the start.