this post was submitted on 15 Jul 2023
193 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

59664 readers
3278 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

SAG-AFTRA has gone on strike for many reasons, but one that stands out to me is an effort to make digital copies of extras and maintain the rights to use them in perpetuity. There are many implications of this, from people losing an opportunity to work, to Ethical implications ex:your likeness is used in a movie/tv show/commercial you would not want to be involved in.

I wanted to take a look at some of the past examples of entertainers likeness' being used posthumously.

Fred Astaire Vaccuum Commercial

Bob Ross Paints the Mountain Dew

Tupac Coachella Performance

Prince Posthumous Album

Whitney Houston Hologram Tour

Anthony Bourdain Voicover

Amy Winehouse Hologram Tour

Paul Walker Furous 7

Peter Cushing Rogue 1

Carrie Fisher Rogue 1 Turns out this is incorrect, Fisher passed after filming of Rogue 1. It was Rise of the Skywalker

There are definitly more examples out there, if you know of any, post them here.

On a personal note, I find this all to be deeply unethical without specific permission granted by the entertainer.

Some souces:

Actors are digitally preserving themselves to continue their careers beyond the grave

Dead celebrities are being digitally resurrected — and the ethics are murky

all 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 43 points 1 year ago (3 children)

The Bob Ross Mountain Dew video is incredibly eerie. Don’t think Bob Ross would have ever done anything like that.

[–] thallamabond 28 points 1 year ago

This singular example contributed to me posting this. Honestly I was enraged when I first saw it. I just don't think he would do that, but more importantly, you cannot ask him.

[–] schwim 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Everything I'd ever read about the Bob Ross "company" that manages his used to be so protective of his likeness being used anywhere he wouldn't approve. I guess if you're offered enough money, you can become okay with anything.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

I doubt Bob himself would have, for any price.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

I feel dirty. That was very uncomfortable to watch.

It's like hearing the voice of a dead relative outside your room. Just wrong.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 year ago

It's pretty creepy to want to use people's likeness forever, so it can be used for any purpose in the future. It's perfectly fair for these actors to be pissed.

Companies will never do the right thing without being forced to do it, it's just not in their nature. So having strikes and forcing their hand along with regulation is the only real solution

[–] Molecular0079 17 points 1 year ago

Maybe if Hollywood would stop doing endless sequels and reboots, they wouldn't need to own the digital likenesses of actors forever...

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Carrie Fisher died after the premiere of Rogue 1, so she doesn’t belong on this list.

[–] thallamabond 6 points 1 year ago

You are absolutely correct, and I'm going to change the body of the party to reflect that.

I knew I had read about Carrie Fisher doing apostomus performance and mistook her de-aging in Rogue One as that performance. Turns out it was Rise of the Skywalker that included previously shot footage which was her posthumous performance. https://www.ign.com/articles/2019/12/31/how-was-carrie-fisher-in-star-wars-rise-of-skywalker-cgi

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I thought the actor who did the MoCap for Tarkin actually looked a lot like Cushing, and they could have easily aged him up with makeup.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

Same as the guy they had be Like recently. It was wild how much he looked like a young Hamil. Just let him use his real face.

[–] Shad0w 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I think Phillip Seymour Hoffman was all CGI in the last Hunger Games movie.

[–] ymhr 12 points 1 year ago

On the case of this and Paul Walker I think it’s Ok, it’s productions they were already involved in and it’s avoiding risk to jobs etc. especially in the case of walker where they had has family involved and iirc his brother was the on set actor.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Not really according to what I read. He had filmed quite a bit of his scenes, so they used what they had, with only a bit of editing. Mostly they rewrote parts of the script to account for missing scenes.

Most notably they made his final dialogue as a letter so that another character could read it.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

My take: Companies can not take actor's body image «for free forever» like they are trying to do, it is just theft and illegal.

If Disney wants to , say, take Harrison Ford body and make an Indiana Jones 6 with ‘‘him’’ (an animated rendering of his body), then they have to pay royalties, negotiate a contract, etc with the person, the same way any of them would do with their IPs. In general, everybody should have their body as their own IP really, by default and retroactively. With largely the same rules as the very IPs of these mergacorporations, so they enter public domain after a while too.

PS: i really want my AI-generated Buster Keaton and OG Popeye short films …