this post was submitted on 08 May 2024
59 points (100.0% liked)

Formula 1

9099 readers
233 users here now

Welcome to Formula1 @ Lemmy.world Lemmy's largest community for Formula 1 and related racing series


Rules


  1. Be respectful to everyone; drivers, lemmings, redditors etc
  2. No gambling, crypto or NFTs
  3. Spoilers are allowed
  4. Non English articles should include a translation in the comments by deepl.com or similar
  5. Paywalled articles should include at least a brief summary in the comments, the wording of the article should not be altered
  6. Social media posts should be posted as screenshots with a link for those who want to view it
  7. Memes are allowed on Monday only as we all do like a laugh or 2, but don’t want to become formuladank.

Up next


F1 Calendar

2024 Calendar

Location Date
πŸ‡ΆπŸ‡¦ Qatar 29 Nov-01 Dec
πŸ‡¦πŸ‡ͺ Abu Dhabi 06-08 Dec

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] supercriticalcheese 10 points 6 months ago (2 children)

So it went back on the previous configuration? Are gravel traps even effective on such short distances to the wall?

[–] chocolatine 14 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I guess it's more to avoid drivers to go too wide than a security measure.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (3 children)

The problem is that it is a tradeoff on driver safety. A gravel trap negates the advantage of going off track, but in turn it is less effective at slowing a car down in case of an accident, and so it leads to higher impact speeds.

Edit: Here's a great video on the topic https://youtu.be/5N06z6VHXGA?si=6sLHvfF9N6dKOHc1

Chain Bear, in case you read this, we miss you, please come back!

[–] supercriticalcheese 4 points 6 months ago

Exactly what I was thinking, how did it get approved in the first place I wonder πŸ€”

Chain Bear, in case you read this, we miss you, please come back!

agreed

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I wonder if it would be better to put speed bumps like they do on chicanes in some tracks to negate the advantage, they could be positioned in an orientation so that the car is unlikely to go over them when running off track but will if going wider for the corner πŸ€”

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago

Oic, those don't work so well with F1 aero πŸ˜‚

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

https://www.piped.video/watch?v=AuvHv_VRUM8

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

[–] Everythingispenguins 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I have always wondered if there could be a little strip of gravel next to the track and then switch back the tarmac. It would keep drivers from dipping their toes off the track and still provide the safety of a tarmac run off.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago

A little strip of gravel is still capable of rolling a car, and also makes the track dirty when a car goes through it. A strip of grass could work.

[–] coffeebiscuit 2 points 6 months ago

Could they be glued gravel traps? (Epoxy resin)

[–] GreenEngineering3475 1 points 6 months ago (3 children)

So, who beaches it first in FP1 ?
My money is on Sainz

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago (1 children)

So, who beaches it first in FP1 ?

Everyone but Williams. Go Williams.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Logan Sargeant has entered the ~~chat~~ Tecpro barriers

(Sorry)

[–] [email protected] 0 points 6 months ago

Not Latifi 2.0! Oh, no!

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago

Sargeant. Not a single doubt in my mind.

[–] Vinny_93 1 points 6 months ago

IIRC Norris had a lot of trouble with Acque Minerali before