this post was submitted on 15 Jul 2023
-22 points (17.6% liked)

conservative

986 readers
96 users here now

A community to discuss conservative politics and views.

Rules:

  1. No racism or bigotry.

  2. Be civil: disagreements happen, but that doesn't provide the right to personally insult others.

  3. No spam posting.

  4. Submission headline should match the article title (don't cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  5. Shitposts and memes are allowed until they prove to be a problem. They can and will be removed at moderator discretion.

  6. No trolling.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

They could only remove illegal content and spam. What do you guys think?

top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] stanleytweedle 6 points 2 years ago

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

That's the government's entire responsibility regarding 'free-speech'- to not make any laws restricting it. The idea that the government is responsible for protecting your speech by providing a safe space or protecting you from the public consequences of unpopular speech only started when conservatives realized a lot of their speech wasn't popular anymore.

[–] TehWorld 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

This has to be the worst idea I’ve heard all week. The free market doesn’t want to hear hate speech and outright lies, which are the other things that might get censored currently.

[–] dudebro 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It doesn't matter what the free market wants.

What matters is the first amendment.

[–] TehWorld 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

You are free to say anything you like. I want no part in my tax dollars funding anyone’s speech.

Besides, who sets the laws on what “illegal” speech looks like.

[–] dudebro -3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Illegal content would be more accurate.

[–] TehWorld 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

What content are you unable to post on FB or Twitter today that requires the government get involved?

[–] dudebro -4 points 2 years ago

Anything prohibited by US law.

[–] SamXavia 3 points 2 years ago

Sounds like a Centralised system that will be controlled by the government, no thank you.

[–] rhacer 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Absolutely not a conservative position.

[–] dudebro 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I mean, considering how crucial social media has become for sharing ideas, the argument would be that the government should facilitate a way for everyone to have access to it.

Having a few big companies control the narrative is hardly free speech.

[–] rhacer 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

If you are a conservative that means you believe government should be small. Adding government agencies and services is antithetical to that.

[–] dudebro -4 points 2 years ago

No it doesn't.

Not in theory, and not in practice.

[–] Blamemeta 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Why not? Would make a good jobs project. Im for it.

[–] BURN 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Is this so you can spew more transphobic content without getting banned?

Government run social media would be awful. There’s not a single upside to it. Everyone would be unhappy on that platform. Moderation would have to be so strict that it would stifle any conversation, and I guarantee one political side at all times would be yelling about how they’re being censored more than the other. Without moderation it’ll turn into a far right cesspool like every other unmoderated social media is.

Also why would I hand my data directly to a government that I don’t trust? At least now they have to go through other companies and 3rd parties.

[–] dudebro -3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I think you have me confused with someone else.

[–] BURN 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Definitely don’t. Checked and I’ve downvoted multiple transphobic comments from you.

[–] dudebro -1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Hm, you must not know what you're talking about then.

I'm sorry you feel that way, but have a nice day.

[–] 4lan 1 points 1 year ago