this post was submitted on 01 May 2024
32 points (97.1% liked)

Technology

1345 readers
128 users here now

Which posts fit here?

Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

[email protected]
[email protected]


Icon attribution | Banner attribution

founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS
 

It sounds like the company is now blocking access from "bootleg" APKs.

top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Blaster_M 13 points 6 months ago (2 children)

I still don't know what this thing is supposed to do

[–] [email protected] 21 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Their idea was to replace a smartphone with a device that just connects to an LLM to do all your smartphone stuff via voice control.

If that sounds like a bad idea, congrats. Youre right.

[–] Blaster_M 3 points 6 months ago (2 children)

It's an interesting futuristic concept, but LLMs, while pretty amazing in their current iteration, are nowhere near ready for that kind of work.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago

It's not an interesting concept. It's a terrible idea. I don't want to have to say everything I want my device to do. What about privacy? What about using your device in loud places? Everything this device claims to do, my phone can do significantly better and more conveniently. It's a cash grab exploiting people who need to buy the next device tech bros thrust on them just like all ai products.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago

Its especially funny that under the hood its just an android app that can run on most existing smartphones (until they blcok access, anyway)

[–] owenfromcanada 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

You know how everyone wishes they had a different physical device for each app? That's this!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago

Ahhh the star trek model.

[–] SpaceNoodle 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

At least the Humane badge attempted to do something unique, albeit half-assedly. The whole Rabbit concept is a joke in a box.

[–] voracitude 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Oh I'm pretty sure they put their whole ass into it.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago

ifixit did a teardown where they briefly speculated on this and I think they nailed it.

This and the humane piece of shit are, at least partially, trying to avoid app store regulation/rules. Apple have basically always been assholes and google are speedrunning that to the point it is genuinely obnoxious to buy kindle books if you use a cell phone at all.

Combine that with trying to sell a new form factor device (similar to smart watches and the like) and it makes sense. Even if the products themselves are still rather meh.